[rororowyourboat]

What changes

Projects can open read-only model explorations without authored views. Scope, representation and source navigation remain independent, with ownership grouping and exact source inspection.

The default example is now a six-file Inspection rover with five guided views: connected architecture, mission, operating states, requirements and component definitions. The air workshop remains a separate launcher choice. Native action/state diagrams render authored graphs, and structural cards show effective declared attributes with concise scalar labels and exact source on hover.

Named structural and behavior diagrams retain orthogonal ELK routes and labels. Native port coordinates and unrelated compound obstacles prevent rover power/command connections crossing the inspection assembly. Routes follow assembly translation; compatible positions and exact source survive portable reopen. Larger structural diagrams use narrower cards and tighter spacing.

Validation

• npm run check: formatting, architecture, TypeScript, 154 Vitest tests and 10 Node checks passed.
• Real pinned-engine browser checks cover all rover views, exact six-file preservation, source reveal, moved layouts and portable reopen; existing assembly and air-workshop coverage retained.
• Actual SVG geometry assertions cover card/compound intersections, labels, physical port endpoints and orthogonal segments. Deliberate-fault regression evidence is retained in docs/verification.md.
• 23 normal desktop/narrow visual comparisons passed in light/dark, including all four diagnostics cases from the previous CI failure. Hosted results are reported separately by CI.

Limits

No execution, simulated performance, behavior editing, exploration persistence, or arbitrary obstacle rerouting after individual-node movement. No dependency/pin or portable-format changes. See the capability table and verification record for exact evidence and skipped coverage.

Recovery screenshot follow-up

Hosted CI passed all 15 critical workflows and 68/69 visual comparisons twice. The remaining recovery-dialog crop included one incidental background pixel at its bottom edge. Scoped capture now hides the unrelated canvas without changing layout, and the affected dialog baseline was inspected and regenerated. All four recovery visual comparisons pass normally; tolerances and application code are unchanged. The final commit triggers a fresh hosted run.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-05T15:18:59.760475Z	2930563	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 293056306d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".