Skip to content

[18.0][MIG] project_task_stage_change_restriction: migration from 16.0#1651

Merged
OCA-git-bot merged 4 commits intoOCA:18.0from
cetmix:18.0-t5166-project_task_stage_change_restriction_migration_from_16.0
Jan 30, 2026
Merged

[18.0][MIG] project_task_stage_change_restriction: migration from 16.0#1651
OCA-git-bot merged 4 commits intoOCA:18.0from
cetmix:18.0-t5166-project_task_stage_change_restriction_migration_from_16.0

Conversation

@Mohajiro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Standard migration from 16.0 to 18.0.

@Mohajiro Mohajiro force-pushed the 18.0-t5166-project_task_stage_change_restriction_migration_from_16.0 branch 4 times, most recently from 7e1782b to 57058e5 Compare January 11, 2026 12:18
Comment thread project_task_stage_change_restriction/models/project_task.py Outdated
Comment thread project_task_stage_change_restriction/models/project_task.py Outdated
Comment thread project_task_stage_change_restriction/models/project_task.py Outdated
@Mohajiro Mohajiro force-pushed the 18.0-t5166-project_task_stage_change_restriction_migration_from_16.0 branch 2 times, most recently from 6fbbc05 to ae6a006 Compare January 11, 2026 19:33
Comment thread project_task_stage_change_restriction/models/project_task.py Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ivs-cetmix ivs-cetmix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review LGTM

@Mohajiro Mohajiro force-pushed the 18.0-t5166-project_task_stage_change_restriction_migration_from_16.0 branch 4 times, most recently from b213487 to 90afe9b Compare January 13, 2026 18:15
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Aldeigja Aldeigja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functional LGTM

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

1 similar comment
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

Mohajiro and others added 4 commits January 27, 2026 10:05
Ensure that only the assigned user, project manager, or users
in allowed groups can change a task’s stage, improving access
control and enforcing project workflows.

Task: 4812
Currently translated at 100.0% (18 of 18 strings)

Translation: project-16.0/project-16.0-project_task_stage_change_restriction
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/project-16-0/project-16-0-project_task_stage_change_restriction/it/
Standard migration from 16.0 to 18.0.

Task: 5166
@Mohajiro Mohajiro force-pushed the 18.0-t5166-project_task_stage_change_restriction_migration_from_16.0 branch from 90afe9b to 238f837 Compare January 27, 2026 09:05
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@francesco-ooops francesco-ooops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functional is ok!

@ivs-cetmix
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hey @Mohajiro thank you for your contribution!
/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 18.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1651-by-ivs-cetmix-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 0af8afc into OCA:18.0 Jan 30, 2026
7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at a43d29f. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@ivs-cetmix ivs-cetmix deleted the 18.0-t5166-project_task_stage_change_restriction_migration_from_16.0 branch January 30, 2026 14:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants