Skip to content

v26.37.0 release notes - #38100

Open
bosconi wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/v26.37.0-release-notes
Open

v26.37.0 release notes#38100
bosconi wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/v26.37.0-release-notes

Conversation

@bosconi

@bosconi bosconi commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Dates in RC snapshots are provisional until the release ships. One commit is added per snapshot; the final snapshot sets the real dates.

Snapshot drafts (with PR links) in mz-skills:

Borderline PRs omitted: rc.1: 9 — omitted.md#borderline

Needs a call from the release owner: #37932 (an extended-protocol pipeline becomes an implicit transaction) is the most user-visible change in this snapshot — it is the PostgreSQL-compatible pipelining fix for pgx SendBatch, psycopg pipeline mode, and libpq pipelining. It is held out only because it sits behind the rollout lever enable_extended_protocol_implicit_transaction, whose code default is true at the v26.37.0-rc.1 tag. If it ships on, it should be promoted into Bug Fixes.

Note on merge order: this branch is cut from main, which does not yet carry #37991 (v26.36.0 release notes). Both PRs insert a section directly below the note block at the top of _index.md, so whichever merges second will need a trivial conflict resolution — the v26.37.0 section belongs above v26.36.0.

Adds the v26.37.0 section to the releases index and the v26.37 row to
the Self-Managed operator compatibility table.

Dates are provisional (Cloud 2026-08-13, Self-Managed 2026-08-14),
estimated from the release cadence; the final snapshot sets them for
real.

Draft with PR links:
https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.37.0/rc.1/release_notes.md
@bosconi
bosconi requested a review from a team as a code owner August 7, 2026 07:19
Lead with the capability and benefit; move the lease-based leader
election detail to explain the RBAC requirement.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants