Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA comprehensive "MVP Builder" kit is introduced that transforms product ideas into structured MVP blueprints through a Lamatic orchestrated workflow. The addition includes a Next.js frontend application with server-side flow orchestration, multiple Lamatic flow definitions (chatbot, API basics, document parsing), a GitHub Actions workflow for syncing flows, and supporting configuration files. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User as User/Browser
participant NextJS as Next.js App
participant Server as Server Action
participant Lamatic as Lamatic Service
participant LLM as LLM Provider
User->>NextJS: Input product idea
User->>NextJS: Submit idea form
NextJS->>Server: Call generatePlan(idea)
Server->>Server: Fetch flow config<br/>Validate workflow ID
Server->>Lamatic: executeFlow(workflowId, {idea})
Lamatic->>Lamatic: Classify idea type
Lamatic->>LLM: Generate features
Lamatic->>LLM: Generate database schema
Lamatic->>LLM: Generate API routes
Lamatic->>LLM: Generate project structure
Lamatic->>LLM: Generate tech stack
Lamatic->>LLM: Generate summary
Lamatic-->>Server: Return plan result
Server-->>NextJS: Return LamaticResponse
NextJS->>NextJS: Render Content component<br/>with plan data
NextJS-->>User: Display structured MVP plan
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment Tip CodeRabbit can generate a title for your PR based on the changes with custom instructions.Set the |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
🧹 Nitpick comments (12)
kits/agentic/mvp-builder/next.config.ts (1)
1-7: Consider adding build configurations for consistency with sibling kits.The config is empty, while the sibling
deep-searchkit (seekits/agentic/deep-search/next.config.mjs) includeseslint.ignoreDuringBuilds,typescript.ignoreBuildErrors, andimages.unoptimizedoptions. If the mvp-builder kit should follow similar patterns, consider adding these options to avoid build failures on linting or type errors during deployment.💡 Suggested configuration for consistency
import type { NextConfig } from "next"; const nextConfig: NextConfig = { - /* config options here */ + eslint: { + ignoreDuringBuilds: true, + }, + typescript: { + ignoreBuildErrors: true, + }, + images: { + unoptimized: true, + }, }; export default nextConfig;lamatic/flows/New.ts (1)
165-177: Async functions returning synchronous data.
getNodesAndEdges()andgetFlowConfig()are markedasyncbut return static in-memory data synchronously. This is a minor inconsistency, though it may be intentional for API consistency if other flow modules perform async operations.lamatic/project.json (1)
1-7: Consider using a generic project name for the kit.The project name
"Darshans Project"and thelive_domainURL contain personal/organization-specific identifiers. For a reusable kit intended for distribution, consider using more generic naming (e.g.,"MVP Builder Project") or documenting that users should update these values.kits/agentic/mvp-builder/lib/lamatic-client.ts (1)
4-8: Add environment variable validation for better error messages.Using non-null assertions (
!) will cause cryptic runtime errors if environment variables are missing. Thekits/agentic/deep-search/lib/lamatic-client.tsimplements a better pattern with explicit validation.♻️ Proposed refactor with validation
import { Lamatic } from 'lamatic'; import { config } from '@/orchestrate'; +if (!config.api.endpoint || !config.api.projectId || !config.api.apiKey) { + throw new Error( + 'Missing Lamatic API credentials. Please set LAMATIC_API_URL, LAMATIC_PROJECT_ID, and LAMATIC_API_KEY in your .env.local file.' + ); +} + export const lamaticClient = new Lamatic({ - endpoint: config.api.endpoint!, - projectId: config.api.projectId!, - apiKey: config.api.apiKey! + endpoint: config.api.endpoint, + projectId: config.api.projectId, + apiKey: config.api.apiKey });kits/agentic/mvp-builder/flows/mvp-builder/meta.json (1)
1-9: Consider populating metadata fields for better discoverability.The
description,tags,testInput, and documentation URLs are empty. Filling these in would improve the flow's discoverability and provide useful context for users integrating this kit.kits/agentic/mvp-builder/actions/orchestrate.ts (1)
7-16: Consider validating emptyideainput.The function validates
workflowIdbut not theideaparameter. An empty or whitespace-only idea would still be passed to the flow, potentially causing unexpected behavior or wasted API calls.Proposed validation
export async function generatePlan(idea: string): Promise<LamaticResponse> { + if (!idea?.trim()) { + throw new Error('Idea cannot be empty'); + } + const flow = config.flows.mvp;kits/agentic/mvp-builder/app/plan/plan-client.tsx (1)
24-24: Remove debugconsole.logstatement.Proposed fix
async function getPlan() { - console.log('Getting plan'); const plan = await generatePlan(idea);kits/agentic/mvp-builder/config.json (1)
20-22: Consider populating optional metadata fields.The
deployUrl,documentationUrl, andimageUrlfields are empty. While not blocking, adding these would improve the kit's discoverability and user experience. Thetagsarray (line 4) could also benefit from relevant keywords like["mvp", "planning", "ai", "generator"].kits/agentic/mvp-builder/app/layout.tsx (2)
18-21: Title and description are identical.Both
titleanddescriptionare set to"Idea to MVP". The description should provide more context for SEO purposes and accessibility (e.g., screen readers, social media previews).📝 Suggested improvement
export const metadata: Metadata = { title: 'Idea to MVP', - description: 'Idea to MVP' + description: 'Transform your product idea into a structured MVP plan with features, database schema, API routes, and tech stack recommendations.' };
6-16: Three fonts are loaded; verify all are used.Three Google fonts are initialized (
Inter,Geist,Geist_Mono), each adding to the page's load time. Ensure all three are actually used in the application. If not, consider removing unused fonts to improve performance.kits/agentic/mvp-builder/components/content.tsx (1)
152-154: Consider using a unique key instead of array index for routes.Using the array index (
i) as the React key forRouteRowis acceptable if routes are static, but if routes could be reordered or filtered dynamically, consider using a composite key like${r.method}-${r.path}for more stable rendering.kits/agentic/mvp-builder/flows/mvp-builder/inputs.json (1)
2-169: Consider reducing repeated model-input blocks to avoid config drift.All seven node sections duplicate the same
generativeModelNamedefinition. If your flow tooling supports templates/shared defaults, centralizing this will reduce maintenance errors.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: e4fbbdbf-33bc-4b10-a272-35cc1035f069
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (7)
kits/agentic/mvp-builder/app/favicon.icois excluded by!**/*.icokits/agentic/mvp-builder/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlkits/agentic/mvp-builder/public/file.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgkits/agentic/mvp-builder/public/globe.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgkits/agentic/mvp-builder/public/next.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgkits/agentic/mvp-builder/public/vercel.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgkits/agentic/mvp-builder/public/window.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (36)
.github/workflows/lamatic-update.ymlkits/agentic/mvp-builder/.env.examplekits/agentic/mvp-builder/.gitignorekits/agentic/mvp-builder/README.mdkits/agentic/mvp-builder/actions/orchestrate.tskits/agentic/mvp-builder/app/globals.csskits/agentic/mvp-builder/app/layout.tsxkits/agentic/mvp-builder/app/page.tsxkits/agentic/mvp-builder/app/plan/page.tsxkits/agentic/mvp-builder/app/plan/plan-client.tsxkits/agentic/mvp-builder/components.jsonkits/agentic/mvp-builder/components/content.tsxkits/agentic/mvp-builder/components/loading.tsxkits/agentic/mvp-builder/components/ui/button.tsxkits/agentic/mvp-builder/config.jsonkits/agentic/mvp-builder/data.tskits/agentic/mvp-builder/eslint.config.mjskits/agentic/mvp-builder/flows/mvp-builder/README.mdkits/agentic/mvp-builder/flows/mvp-builder/config.jsonkits/agentic/mvp-builder/flows/mvp-builder/inputs.jsonkits/agentic/mvp-builder/flows/mvp-builder/meta.jsonkits/agentic/mvp-builder/lib/lamatic-client.tskits/agentic/mvp-builder/lib/utils.tskits/agentic/mvp-builder/next.config.tskits/agentic/mvp-builder/orchestrate.jskits/agentic/mvp-builder/package.jsonkits/agentic/mvp-builder/pnpm-workspace.yamlkits/agentic/mvp-builder/postcss.config.mjskits/agentic/mvp-builder/tsconfig.jsonkits/agentic/mvp-builder/types/index.tslamatic/flows/2-APIBasics.tslamatic/flows/ApprehensiveOyster.tslamatic/flows/BrokenHoney-5230.tslamatic/flows/New.tslamatic/flows/ScruffyAbility.tslamatic/project.json
| AGENTIC_GENERATE_CONTENT = "YOUR_FLOW_ID" | ||
| LAMATIC_API_URL = "YOUR_API_ENDPOINT" | ||
| LAMATIC_PROJECT_ID = "YOUR_PROJECT_ID" | ||
| LAMATIC_API_KEY = "YOUR_API_KEY" No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix .env formatting: remove spaces around = and add trailing newline.
Spaces around = can cause parsing issues with some dotenv implementations. Standard .env format uses KEY=value without spaces.
🔧 Proposed fix
-AGENTIC_GENERATE_CONTENT = "YOUR_FLOW_ID"
-LAMATIC_API_URL = "YOUR_API_ENDPOINT"
-LAMATIC_PROJECT_ID = "YOUR_PROJECT_ID"
-LAMATIC_API_KEY = "YOUR_API_KEY"
+AGENTIC_GENERATE_CONTENT="YOUR_FLOW_ID"
+LAMATIC_API_KEY="YOUR_API_KEY"
+LAMATIC_API_URL="YOUR_API_ENDPOINT"
+LAMATIC_PROJECT_ID="YOUR_PROJECT_ID"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| AGENTIC_GENERATE_CONTENT = "YOUR_FLOW_ID" | |
| LAMATIC_API_URL = "YOUR_API_ENDPOINT" | |
| LAMATIC_PROJECT_ID = "YOUR_PROJECT_ID" | |
| LAMATIC_API_KEY = "YOUR_API_KEY" | |
| AGENTIC_GENERATE_CONTENT="YOUR_FLOW_ID" | |
| LAMATIC_API_KEY="YOUR_API_KEY" | |
| LAMATIC_API_URL="YOUR_API_ENDPOINT" | |
| LAMATIC_PROJECT_ID="YOUR_PROJECT_ID" | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)
[warning] 1-1: [SpaceCharacter] The line has spaces around equal sign
(SpaceCharacter)
[warning] 2-2: [SpaceCharacter] The line has spaces around equal sign
(SpaceCharacter)
[warning] 3-3: [SpaceCharacter] The line has spaces around equal sign
(SpaceCharacter)
[warning] 4-4: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file
(EndingBlankLine)
[warning] 4-4: [SpaceCharacter] The line has spaces around equal sign
(SpaceCharacter)
[warning] 4-4: [UnorderedKey] The LAMATIC_API_KEY key should go before the LAMATIC_API_URL key
(UnorderedKey)
|
|
||
| import { lamaticClient } from '@/lib/lamatic-client'; | ||
| import { config } from '@/orchestrate'; | ||
| import { LamaticResponse } from 'lamatic/dist/types'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if LamaticResponse is exported from the main package entry
fd -t f 'package.json' --exec cat {} \; | jq -r '.main, .types, .exports' 2>/dev/null || echo "package.json not found in repo"
# Search for LamaticResponse usage patterns in the codebase
rg -n "from ['\"]lamatic" --type tsRepository: Lamatic/AgentKit
Length of output: 1026
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for LamaticResponse definitions and re-exports
rg -n "LamaticResponse" --type ts --type tsx
# Check if there are any type stub files or index files that might re-export it
fd -t f "index\.(ts|d\.ts|js)" --path "*lamatic*"Repository: Lamatic/AgentKit
Length of output: 321
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for LamaticResponse definitions and re-exports
rg -n "LamaticResponse" --type ts
# Look for type definition files
fd -t f "index" | grep -E "\.(ts|d\.ts)$"
# Check if LamaticResponse might be exported from public api
rg -n "export.*LamaticResponse" --type tsRepository: Lamatic/AgentKit
Length of output: 457
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the types/index.ts file
cat -n kits/agentic/mvp-builder/types/index.ts
# Search for other LamaticResponse-like response type imports
rg -n "Response.*from" kits/agentic/mvp-builder --type ts
# Check if there are other server action files that might handle responses
fd -t f "action" kits/agentic/mvp-builderRepository: Lamatic/AgentKit
Length of output: 1027
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the orchestrate.ts file
cat -n kits/agentic/mvp-builder/actions/orchestrate.ts
# Also check if there are any other similar response patterns in related files
rg -n "Promise<" kits/agentic/mvp-builder --type ts -A 2 -B 2Repository: Lamatic/AgentKit
Length of output: 1186
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the lamatic-client file to see how lamaticClient is typed
cat -n kits/agentic/mvp-builder/lib/lamatic-client.ts
# Search for any .d.ts files that might provide type definitions
fd -t f "\\.d\\.ts$"
# Check if there are any type imports from lamatic at all
rg -n "from.*lamatic.*types" --type tsRepository: Lamatic/AgentKit
Length of output: 441
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for any 'lamatic/types' imports or references
rg -n "lamatic/types" --type ts
# Check if there's a types export mentioned anywhere in config files
rg -n "lamatic" tsconfig.json package.json 2>/dev/null || true
# Look at how the Lamatic class and its methods are used to understand the return type
rg -n "executeFlow" --type ts -A 3 -B 1Repository: Lamatic/AgentKit
Length of output: 7022
Avoid importing from internal dist paths.
Importing from 'lamatic/dist/types' is fragile as internal paths may change between package versions without notice. This is the only file in the codebase that imports from lamatic/dist/types; all other files import from the public 'lamatic' API and work with the response object without explicit type imports. Either check if LamaticResponse is publicly exported from the 'lamatic' package, or define a local response type based on the actual structure being used.
| const [input, setInput] = useState(''); | ||
| const router = useRouter(); | ||
|
|
||
| function handleSubmit(e: React.SubmitEvent<HTMLFormElement>) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
What is the correct TypeScript type for form onSubmit event handler in React?
💡 Result:
The correct TypeScript type for a React form onSubmit event handler is (event: React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>) => void. This is the standard type used across authoritative sources including React TypeScript Cheatsheet, Kent C. Dodds' Epic React, and numerous Stack Overflow answers with high consensus. In React 19+, FormEvent is deprecated in favor of SubmitEvent types (e.g., SubmitEventHandler<HTMLFormElement> or SyntheticEvent<HTMLFormElement, SubmitEvent> for submitter access), but React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement> remains backward compatible and widely used without deprecation warnings in most setups as of 2026. Example usage: const handleSubmit = (event: React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>) => { event.preventDefault; // form logic }; <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}> // inputs </form>
Citations:
- 1: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70646761/typescript-type-for-form-submit-event
- 2: https://www.epicreact.dev/how-to-type-a-react-form-on-submit-handler
- 3: https://www.kindacode.com/article/react-typescript-handling-form-onsubmit-event
- 4: https://react-typescript-cheatsheet.netlify.app/docs/basic/getting-started/forms_and_events
- 5: https://jsdev.space/react-form-events-guide/
- 6: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71136851/react-typescript-onsubmit-type
- 7: https://www.webdevtutor.net/blog/typescript-react-onsubmit-event-type
🏁 Script executed:
# Check the actual file content
cat -n kits/agentic/mvp-builder/app/page.tsx | head -30Repository: Lamatic/AgentKit
Length of output: 1461
🏁 Script executed:
# Find package.json to check React version
fd -t f package.json | head -5 | xargs grep -l '"react"' | head -1 | xargs cat | grep -A2 '"react"'Repository: Lamatic/AgentKit
Length of output: 144
Invalid type: React.SubmitEvent does not exist.
React.SubmitEvent is not a valid React type. Use React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement> for form submission handlers.
🐛 Proposed fix
- function handleSubmit(e: React.SubmitEvent<HTMLFormElement>) {
+ function handleSubmit(e: React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function handleSubmit(e: React.SubmitEvent<HTMLFormElement>) { | |
| function handleSubmit(e: React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>) { |
|
|
||
| const PlanClient = () => { | ||
| const searchParams = useSearchParams(); | ||
| const idea = searchParams.get('idea')!; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing null check for idea query parameter.
The non-null assertion searchParams.get('idea')! will return null if the parameter is missing, which gets passed to generatePlan(null) and subsequently to the Lamatic flow. This could cause confusing errors or unexpected behavior.
Proposed fix with early return or redirect
const PlanClient = () => {
const searchParams = useSearchParams();
- const idea = searchParams.get('idea')!;
+ const idea = searchParams.get('idea');
const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true);
const [plan, setPlan] = useState<Plan | null>(null);
+ const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null);
+
+ if (!idea) {
+ return <div>No idea provided. Please go back and enter your idea.</div>;
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const idea = searchParams.get('idea')!; | |
| const PlanClient = () => { | |
| const searchParams = useSearchParams(); | |
| const idea = searchParams.get('idea'); | |
| const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true); | |
| const [plan, setPlan] = useState<Plan | null>(null); | |
| const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null); | |
| if (!idea) { | |
| return <div>No idea provided. Please go back and enter your idea.</div>; | |
| } |
| async function getPlan() { | ||
| console.log('Getting plan'); | ||
| const plan = await generatePlan(idea); | ||
| setIsLoading(false); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!plan.result) { | ||
| throw new Error('No result'); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| setPlan(plan.result.result); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| getPlan(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unhandled async error can cause unhandled promise rejection.
When throw new Error('No result') is executed inside the async getPlan function, it won't be caught by React and results in an unhandled promise rejection. Consider using error state to handle failures gracefully.
Proposed error handling pattern
+ const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null);
+
useEffect(() => {
if (hasFetched.current) return;
hasFetched.current = true;
async function getPlan() {
- console.log('Getting plan');
- const plan = await generatePlan(idea);
- setIsLoading(false);
-
- if (!plan.result) {
- throw new Error('No result');
+ try {
+ const plan = await generatePlan(idea);
+ if (!plan.result) {
+ setError('No result from plan generation');
+ return;
+ }
+ setPlan(plan.result.result);
+ } catch (err) {
+ setError(err instanceof Error ? err.message : 'An error occurred');
+ } finally {
+ setIsLoading(false);
}
-
- setPlan(plan.result.result);
}
getPlan();
}, [idea]);| Reference: | ||
|
|
||
| --- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incomplete "Reference:" line.
Line 116 contains "Reference:" with no content following it. Either add the intended reference or remove this line.
| ``` | ||
| http://localhost:3000 | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add language specifier to fenced code block.
The code block should specify a language for proper syntax highlighting and linting compliance.
📝 Proposed fix
-```
+```txt
http://localhost:3000</details>
<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>
<details>
<summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.21.0)</summary>
[warning] 209-209: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
</details>
</details>
<!-- fingerprinting:phantom:poseidon:ocelot -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
| "memories": "[]", | ||
| "messages": "{{triggerNode_1.output.chatHistory}}", | ||
| "nodeName": "RAG", | ||
| "vectorDB": "VectorDB3507", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hardcoded VectorDB reference.
The vectorDB: "VectorDB3507" is hardcoded. If this database name differs across environments, the RAG queries will fail. Consider parameterizing this or documenting the expected setup.
| "generativeModelName": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "generator/text", | ||
| "params": {}, | ||
| "configName": "configA", | ||
| "model_name": "gpt-4o-mini", | ||
| "credentialId": "58e84b53-2d11-48b5-bc8d-928d1f241c59", | ||
| "provider_name": "openai", | ||
| "credential_name": "API" | ||
| } | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this credential ID pattern is used consistently across flow files
rg -n "credentialId" --type ts lamatic/flows/Repository: Lamatic/AgentKit
Length of output: 890
Hardcoded credential IDs appear across multiple flow files and may cause environment coupling.
The credentialId "58e84b53-2d11-48b5-bc8d-928d1f241c59" is hardcoded in this flow configuration and also appears in ScruffyAbility.ts, ApprehensiveOyster.ts, and 2-APIBasics.ts. If these IDs are environment-specific or per-deployment credentials, this hardcoding will cause failures when deployed to staging, production, or other environments. Credential references should be parameterized or resolved at runtime rather than baked into the flow definitions.
| "credentialId": "58e84b53-2d11-48b5-bc8d-928d1f241c59", | ||
| "provider_name": "openai", | ||
| "credential_name": "API" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hardcoded credential IDs may pose a security risk.
The flow config contains hardcoded credentialId values (repeated at lines 148-150, 279-282, 325-328). If these reference real credentials in a Lamatic environment, committing them to source control could expose sensitive information or create tight coupling to a specific deployment.
Consider parameterizing these values or confirming they are non-sensitive identifiers that are safe to commit.
3 participants
What This Kit Does
Converts a single product idea into a structured MVP plan including app type, features, database schema, API routes, project structure, tech stack, and summary using a multi-step Lamatic flow.
Providers & Prerequisites
How to Run Locally
cd kits/agentic/mvp-builderpnpm installcp .env.example .envand fill in valuespnpm devLive Preview
https://mvp-builder-sigma.vercel.app/
Lamatic Flow
Flow ID:
AGENTIC_GENERATE_CONTENTnpm run dev.env.examplehas no secrets, only placeholdersREADME.mddocuments setup and usagekits/<category>/<kit-name>/config.jsonis present and validflows/folderMVP Builder AgentKit
Feature Addition:
Architecture & Tech Stack:
Kit Structure:
kits/agentic/mvp-builder/Setup Requirements:
cd kits/agentic/mvp-builder && pnpm install && pnpm devDeployment & Testing:
Additional Flow Exports: