Skip to content
View Keedz1Off's full-sized avatar
🏠
Working from home
🏠
Working from home

Block or report Keedz1Off

Block user

Prevent this user from interacting with your repositories and sending you notifications. Learn more about blocking users.

You must be logged in to block users.

Content in all repositories owned by your account will be closed.
Maximum 250 characters. Please don’t include any personal information such as legal names or email addresses. Markdown is supported. This note will only be visible to you.
Report abuse

Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.

Report abuse
Keedz1Off/README.md

Keedz1 | AI Agent & Application Security

I investigate security boundaries in AI agents, MCP integrations, and tool-enabled applications. My background is in Web3 security, including smart contracts, cross-chain authorization, bridge flows, and token-accounting invariants.

My current focus is AI Agent Security and AppSec: understanding how applications work, where trust changes, and whether security checks hold during execution.

Focus

  • Authentication, authorization, tool permissions, and data isolation.
  • Untrusted content and prompt-injection boundaries.
  • MCP/OAuth sessions, token lifecycle, and transport errors.
  • Shared state, concurrency, cancellation, and resource cleanup.

Experience

My portfolio includes local investigations of Browser Use, FastMCP / MCP Python SDK, and a LangGraph-based application. The work covers navigation-policy enforcement, error propagation after token revocation, and SQLite resource lifecycle, including reproductions, upstream fix verification, and a local cleanup patch with regression tests.

I participated in ETHOnline 2026 with Voxel Bench. The project publicly credits me for SR-01, a recipe-authorship vulnerability identified through AI-assisted contract review and local tests. The team implemented an attester-based fix and retained the regression evidence.

Method & automation

Map the architecture → define boundary invariants → design controls and negative scenarios → test locally → inspect evidence → verify fixes.

I use AI-assisted tooling for source analysis, test generation, and automation. Conclusions rely on observed behavior, logs, and repeatable checks, with scope and remaining evidence gaps recorded in each report.

Open to remote AI security and application security roles, contract work, and research collaboration.

Telegram · Email

Pinned Loading

  1. fastmcp-auth-state-sse-case-study fastmcp-auth-state-sse-case-study Public

    Independent AI-assisted PrefectHQ FastMCP case study: auth, shared OAuth state, SSE error propagation, evidence and limitations.

    Python

  2. learn-with-genai-resource-lifecycle-case-study learn-with-genai-resource-lifecycle-case-study Public

    AI-assisted case study: confirmed SQLite resource-lifecycle bug, local fix, and regression tests. No confirmed DoS claim.

  3. browser-use-agent-security-case-study browser-use-agent-security-case-study Public

    Independent AI-assisted Browser Use trust-boundary case study: scoped local evidence, architecture, and calibrated conclusions.

    Python 1

  4. web3-security-portfolio web3-security-portfolio Public

    Web3 security portfolio: bridge architecture, authorization boundaries, accounting invariants, Foundry testing, and evidence-qualified case studies.