Skip to content

test(Achievements-accessibility): verify Accessibility Standards & Screen Reader Aria Compliance#3928

Open
anshika1179 wants to merge 1 commit into
JhaSourav07:mainfrom
anshika1179:fix-issue-2476
Open

test(Achievements-accessibility): verify Accessibility Standards & Screen Reader Aria Compliance#3928
anshika1179 wants to merge 1 commit into
JhaSourav07:mainfrom
anshika1179:fix-issue-2476

Conversation

@anshika1179
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fixes #2476

This PR adds isolated accessibility and integration testing for the Achievements.tsx component. The test suite specifically verifies:

  • Correct use of accessible label coordinates and implicit roles.
  • Elements that accept key focus (like buttons) maintain visible focus and are interactive.
  • Tooltip/descriptive labels are properly rendered and accessible.
  • Normal tab ordering through keyboard control path selectors.
  • Standard headings exist in the correct logical hierarchical order (H3 followed by H4s).

Pillar

  • 🎨 Pillar 1 — New Theme Design
  • 📐 Pillar 2 — Geometric SVG Improvement
  • 🕐 Pillar 3 — Timezone Logic Optimization
  • 🛠️ Other (Bug fix, refactoring, docs)

Visual Preview

(No visual changes as this is purely a test coverage improvement)

Checklist before requesting a review:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md file.
  • I have tested these changes locally (localhost:3000/api/streak?user=YOUR_USERNAME).
  • I have run npm run format and npm run lint locally and resolved all errors (CI will fail otherwise).
  • My commits follow the Conventional Commits format (e.g., feat(themes): ..., fix(calculate): ...).
  • I have updated README.md if I added a new theme or URL parameter.
  • I have started the repo.
  • I have made sure that i have only one commit to merge in this PR.
  • The SVG output matches the CommitPulse "premium quality" aesthetic standard (no raw elements, smooth animations, correct fonts).
  • (Recommended) I joined the CommitPulse Discord community for contributor discussions, mentorship, and faster PR support.

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

@anshika1179 is attempting to deploy a commit to the jhasourav07's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

🚨 Hey @anshika1179, the CI Pipeline is failing on this PR and it has been marked as status:blocked.

Please fix the issues before this can be reviewed. Here's how:

1. Run checks locally before pushing:

npm run format:check   # Check Prettier formatting
npm run lint           # Run ESLint
npm run typecheck      # TypeScript type check
npm run test           # Run unit tests (Vitest)
npm run build          # Verify production build passes

2. Auto-fix common issues:

npm run format         # Auto-fix formatting with Prettier
npm run lint -- --fix  # Auto-fix lint errors where possible

3. Check the full failure log here:
👉 View CI Run

Once you push a fix and the CI passes, the status:blocked label will be removed automatically. 💪

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the status:blocked This PR is blocked due to a failing CI check. label Jun 5, 2026
@Aamod007 Aamod007 added GSSoC 2026 mentor:Aamod007 level:beginner Small changes Usually isolated fixes or simple UI/text updates. quality:clean PR follows clean coding practices, proper formatting, documentation, and maintainability standards. labels Jun 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

GSSoC 2026 level:beginner Small changes Usually isolated fixes or simple UI/text updates. mentor:Aamod007 quality:clean PR follows clean coding practices, proper formatting, documentation, and maintainability standards. status:blocked This PR is blocked due to a failing CI check.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test(Achievements-accessibility): verify Accessibility Standards & Screen Reader Aria Compliance (Variation 4)

2 participants