Skip to content

Conversation

@N-Plx
Copy link
Collaborator

@N-Plx N-Plx commented Jan 20, 2026

…imes

@N-Plx N-Plx linked an issue Jan 20, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@baltzell
Copy link
Collaborator

What's the reason for the float->Float switch?

@baltzell
Copy link
Collaborator

What's the reason for the float->Float switch?

Probably just for the convenience of null, which is just fine if it's not called much. But for a low-level "hit" class that gets instantiated a lot (?), keep in mind Float incurs more JVM memory garbage.

@N-Plx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

N-Plx commented Jan 21, 2026

Yes the float->Float is to be able to use null. Not sure what is safer memory-wise, I'm open to updating it if you have advice!

@N-Plx N-Plx enabled auto-merge (squash) January 21, 2026 17:04
@N-Plx N-Plx merged commit f9027cf into development Jan 21, 2026
40 checks passed
@c-dilks c-dilks deleted the 1069-time-offsets-for-alert-atof branch January 21, 2026 23:44
@c-dilks c-dilks added the rg-l label Jan 21, 2026
@baltzell
Copy link
Collaborator

It's not about "safety", just memory usage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Time offsets for ALERT ATOF

4 participants