Skip to content

fix(OpenGeode): update to new Identifier#172

Open
BotellaA wants to merge 1 commit intonextfrom
v16
Open

fix(OpenGeode): update to new Identifier#172
BotellaA wants to merge 1 commit intonextfrom
v16

Conversation

@BotellaA
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@BotellaA BotellaA requested a review from panquez February 27, 2026 20:19
Comment on lines +165 to +167
absl::StrCat( "Surface ",
surface.name().value_or( surface.id().string() ),
" (", surface.id().string(), ") has vertices ",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This kind of message may show twice the id. Is it something OK? No problem from my side but I must raise this point

surface2.name(), " (",
polygon_pair.second.component_id.id().string(),
absl::StrCat( "Surfaces ",
surface1.name().value_or( surface1.id().string() ),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a lot of occurrences of such code
toto.name().value_or( toto.id().string()

Is there some room for a Identifier method returning always a string which is either the (copied) name or the (build) id as a string?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants