Skip to content

Include remote instances in hub feature table - #5587

Open
knolleary wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
knolleary-patch-3
Open

Include remote instances in hub feature table#5587
knolleary wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
knolleary-patch-3

Conversation

@knolleary

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This updates the pricing page to include edge instances in Hub - but without the more advanced features of Device Groups etc.

Rationale:

  1. This is what had been documented internally in both the working doc and pricing spreadsheet following previous discussions. This PR brings the page inline with what had been agreed.
  2. With trial accounts coming in at hub, not having edge instances available makes the edge onboarding harder for first-time users evaluating things

This updates the pricing page to include edge instances in Hub - but without the more advanced features of Device Groups etc.

Rationale:

1. This is what had been documented internally in both the working doc and pricing spreadsheet following previous discussions. This PR brings the page inline with what had been agreed.
2. With trial accounts coming in at hub, *not* having edge instances available makes the edge onboarding harder for first-time users evaluating things
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for flowforge-website ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e1fd780
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/flowforge-website/deploys/6a7d88995268eb00088c3d92
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-5587--flowforge-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 63 (🔴 down 3 from production)
Accessibility: 96 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (no change from production)
SEO: 85 (no change from production)
PWA: -
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

title: Edge Development
description: "Develop and test Node-RED flows directly on edge devices with a remote editor proxy."
tiers: { edge: true, hub: false, fleet: true }
tiers: { edge: true, hub: true, fleet: true }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@knolleary How many? I would limit this.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What had been agreed was the license includes a set number of runtimes - that could be either hosted or remote - rather than individual limits.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@knolleary So what's the difference between Hub and Edge?

title: Edge Instances
description: "Deploy and mange your Node-RED instances on edge PLCs and gateways, with full visibility and control from the cloud."
tiers: { edge: true, hub: false, fleet: true }
tiers: { edge: true, hub: true, fleet: true }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@knolleary How many? I would limit this.

@ZJvandeWeg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@knolleary I think a better fix for allowing users to experience edge instances is onboarding them to Edge instead of Hub.
Is that a good middle ground here?

@knolleary

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Yes, a trial at Edge level resolves that part.

The goal of this PR was to fix what I saw as a discrepancy between what had been agreed in previous discussions and what had been published to the pricing page, rather than reopen what I thought was a resolved discussion. As long as all everyone else is aware of this change, then we can close this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants