Skip to content

fix: revert flag-engine v10 revert to re-apply engine upgrade#6741

Open
gagantrivedi wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
revert-pr-6674
Open

fix: revert flag-engine v10 revert to re-apply engine upgrade#6741
gagantrivedi wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
revert-pr-6674

Conversation

@gagantrivedi
Copy link
Member

Thanks for submitting a PR! Please check the boxes below:

  • I have read the Contributing Guide.
  • I have added information to docs/ if required so people know about the feature.
  • I have filled in the "Changes" section below.
  • I have filled in the "How did you test this code" section below.

Changes

Reverts #6674

This PR reverts the flag-engine v10 revert, effectively re-applying the original upgrade from #6653, including:

  • Upgrading flagsmith-flag-engine from the fix/missing-export branch back to ^10.0.3
  • Upgrading flagsmith SDK from ^3.10.0 back to ^5.1.1
  • Restoring pydantic-collections dependency
  • Restoring all vendored Pydantic models in util/engine_models/
  • Restoring updated imports across the codebase

How did you test this code?

  • CI tests should pass

This reverts commit faa031c,
effectively re-applying the flag-engine v10 upgrade from #6653.
@gagantrivedi gagantrivedi requested review from a team as code owners February 20, 2026 07:49
@gagantrivedi gagantrivedi requested review from Zaimwa9 and removed request for a team February 20, 2026 07:49
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 20, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

3 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
docs Ignored Ignored Feb 20, 2026 7:49am
flagsmith-frontend-preview Ignored Ignored Feb 20, 2026 7:49am
flagsmith-frontend-staging Ignored Ignored Feb 20, 2026 7:49am

Request Review

@github-actions github-actions bot added api Issue related to the REST API fix labels Feb 20, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Docker builds report

Image Build Status Security report
ghcr.io/flagsmith/flagsmith-e2e:pr-6741 Finished ✅ Skipped
ghcr.io/flagsmith/flagsmith-frontend:pr-6741 Finished ✅ Results
ghcr.io/flagsmith/flagsmith-api-test:pr-6741 Finished ✅ Skipped
ghcr.io/flagsmith/flagsmith:pr-6741 Finished ✅ Results
ghcr.io/flagsmith/flagsmith-private-cloud:pr-6741 Finished ✅ Results

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.24%. Comparing base (7c0bf27) to head (fdd9cad).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6741      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.23%   98.24%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1312     1327      +15     
  Lines       48490    48799     +309     
==========================================
+ Hits        47633    47942     +309     
  Misses        857      857              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api Issue related to the REST API fix

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments