Repository navigation
feat: Support getExperimentFlag, trackEvent and trackExposure methods - #156
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Its entry in Flagsmith/sdk-spec's compatibility matrix at v0.7.1: `core or events or local-evaluation`.
|
Important Review skippedThis PR was authored by a bot without an assigned CodeRabbit review seat. Ask an organization administrator to assign a seat to the bot. See the seat-assignment guide. After the seat is assigned, request a review again.
 |
…osures Implements the events steps of SDK spec v0.6.0. - `Flagsmith::getExperimentFlag()` gets an identity's flag and records a `$flag_exposure` event for the variant served, when the identity is enrolled in a running experiment on the feature. - `Flagsmith::trackEvent()` and `Flagsmith::trackExposureEvent()` record custom and exposure events; `Flagsmith::flushEvents()` sends them now. - `EventProcessor` buffers events, deduplicates exposures, and posts them to the Flagsmith events API on flush, when full, after the flush interval, or when destroyed. Events are opt-in via `enableEvents`. - `Flag` exposes the `variant` and `experiment` the identities API returns. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> (cherry picked from commit 0dad745)
- Reject `withEventProcessor()` on offline instances, as the constructor already does for `enableEvents`. - Remove `EventProcessor`'s unused `$timeout` parameter: PSR-18 has no per-request timeout, so document passing a client configured with one. - Read the SDK version from composer.json once per process. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> (cherry picked from commit c3b3474)
Contributor
Author
|
The spec job failed because v0.7.1 now runs this SDK's Changes
Verification (local)
|
flagsmithsmith
Bot
requested review from
emyller
and removed request for
a team
November 5, 2026 22:37
flagsmithsmith
Bot
changed the title
getExperimentFlag, trackEvent and trackExposure methods
gagantrivedi
approved these changes
Nov 9, 2026
gagantrivedi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2026
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [5.3.0](v5.2.0...v5.3.0) (2026-11-09) ### Features * Support `getExperimentFlag`, `trackEvent` and `trackExposure` methods ([#156](#156)) ([42b3fff](42b3fff)) ### Other * Let Renovate keep updating spec bumps the webhook handler commits to ([#153](#153)) ([faddb16](faddb16)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contributes to Flagsmith/sdk-spec#13