Skip to content

Bump equalsverifier from 3.4.2 to 3.4.3 - #5

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
dependabot/maven/master/nl.jqno.equalsverifier-equalsverifier-3.4.3
Closed

Bump equalsverifier from 3.4.2 to 3.4.3#5
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
dependabot/maven/master/nl.jqno.equalsverifier-equalsverifier-3.4.3

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Sep 21, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bumps equalsverifier from 3.4.2 to 3.4.3.

Changelog

Sourced from equalsverifier's changelog.

[3.4.3] - 2020-09-08

Changed

  • Added more helpful error message explaining why EqualsVerifier can't verify subclasses of java.util.ArrayList. (Issue 341)
  • Changes order of processing fields (non-statics first, statics later) so static fields don't obscure issues that are really in non-static fields. (Issue 159)

Fixed

  • Added prefab values for java.net.URL. (Issue 340)
  • Fixed support for records with static fields in JDK 14. (Issue 346; thanks Edgar!)
  • ByteBuddy experimental support (needed for Java 16 support) can now be accessed via -Dnet.bytebuddy.experimental=true again instead of -Dnl.jqno.equalsverifier.internal.lib.bytebuddy.experimental=true. (Issue 339; thanks Stefano!)
Commits
  • 17d929f [maven-release-plugin] prepare release equalsverifier-3.4.3
  • 6c854f2 Fixes CI for all JDK versions
  • 9c3337c Fixes build on JDK15 by enabling experimental flag there
  • 90d0620 #159 Processes non-static fields before static fields so static fields don't ...
  • 50ae101 Fixes test that fails only on JDK15
  • cc078c6 Fixes flaky test that depended on hashCode being stable
  • 472dc92 #341 Adds helpful error message when testing a subclass of ArrayList
  • a53f0e2 Updates CHANGELOG
  • c44c31b Lowers coverage threshold (temporarily?) because Records code won't get execu...
  • 6d44361 Merge pull request #347 from nstdio/issue-346
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually

@dependabot @github

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Sep 21, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Dependabot tried to add @MarkEWaite as a reviewer to this PR, but received the following error from GitHub:

POST https://api.github.com/repos/FishingCactus/git-client-plugin/pulls/5/requested_reviewers: 422 - Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the FishingCactus/git-client-plugin repository. // See: https://docs.github.com/rest/reference/pulls#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request

@dependabot @github

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Sep 21, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

The following labels could not be found: dependencies.

@dependabot @github

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Oct 26, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Superseded by #17.

@dependabot dependabot Bot closed this Oct 26, 2020
@dependabot
dependabot Bot deleted the dependabot/maven/master/nl.jqno.equalsverifier-equalsverifier-3.4.3 branch October 26, 2020 06:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants