Hi, I am Sam, I maintain Vestige, a local first memory server for coding agents with a similar shared memory goal to SyncMind, so this is as much a peer question as a pitch. Your dedup step merges any memory that is more than eighty percent similar via pg_trgm, which is a solid answer to near duplicate write reduction. What I could not find in the README is what happens when two memories are not near duplicates but flatly disagree, for example one agent writes that auth middleware must run before DB queries and a later agent, or the same agent after the code changed, writes the opposite. Vestige handles that case with bitemporal supersession, the earlier fact gets stamped invalid instead of deleted or merged away, so an as of query can still show what was true before the correction, and contradiction detection surfaces the conflict with a trust weighted risk score instead of one write silently winning on recency or similarity. Does SyncMind's freshness score currently distinguish a memory that is simply old but still true from one that a newer write has actually contradicted, or does an old memory just fade in ranking the same way regardless of whether it was superseded or just unused.
Hi, I am Sam, I maintain Vestige, a local first memory server for coding agents with a similar shared memory goal to SyncMind, so this is as much a peer question as a pitch. Your dedup step merges any memory that is more than eighty percent similar via pg_trgm, which is a solid answer to near duplicate write reduction. What I could not find in the README is what happens when two memories are not near duplicates but flatly disagree, for example one agent writes that auth middleware must run before DB queries and a later agent, or the same agent after the code changed, writes the opposite. Vestige handles that case with bitemporal supersession, the earlier fact gets stamped invalid instead of deleted or merged away, so an as of query can still show what was true before the correction, and contradiction detection surfaces the conflict with a trust weighted risk score instead of one write silently winning on recency or similarity. Does SyncMind's freshness score currently distinguish a memory that is simply old but still true from one that a newer write has actually contradicted, or does an old memory just fade in ranking the same way regardless of whether it was superseded or just unused.