Repository navigation
Conversation
Codex Review Summary: ✅ CompletedThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Sentinel 已审核此变更,并发现 1 个已核验问题。 无法定位到 diff 的已核验问题claim 重命名成功但更新时间失败时遗留未跟踪占用🟠 严重程度:中(P2) Finding: 当前为 开发 agent 查询详情: 调用 MCP 工具 由 Sentinel 审核 · 目标提交 362b2517c287 |
Summary
A temporary evidence read failure followed by a failed claim release can leave a fresh .taking file behind. An immediate native retry previously omitted that claim and could finish the turn with empty evidence.
Require complete notes and baseline takes. A native retry waits for every earlier claim and surfaces claim access errors. Generic report and retention queues retain their concurrent append behavior.
Evidence
Merge Danger
Two-way. Scope is evidence completeness during native retry. Continuing access failures leave the turn waiting for the claim to be released or expire.