Skip to content

chore(ci): drop the 0.4.x Trusted Publisher migration note - #16

Merged
dani1005 merged 1 commit into
v1from
chore/drop-publish-note
Aug 1, 2026
Merged

chore(ci): drop the 0.4.x Trusted Publisher migration note#16
dani1005 merged 1 commit into
v1from
chore/drop-publish-note

Conversation

@dani1005

@dani1005 dani1005 commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Removes a 4-line comment block from .github/workflows/publish.yml.

The note recorded a one-time setup step — everos-cloud was published from
github.com/evermemos/everos-cloud-python through 0.4.1, so publishing from
this repo needed a Trusted Publisher for it added to the existing PyPI project.
1.0.0 shipped from this workflow, so that's settled. With the repo now public
it just reads as a stale internal memo.

The preceding comment keeps the part that still matters: a Trusted Publisher
must be configured for everos-cloud pointing at this repo + publish.yml.

Comment-only — no change to triggers, permissions, or steps. Verified the YAML
still parses (on.push.tags: ['v*.*.*'], 5 steps, id-token: write intact).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01LdqRBYsdEoyC45w9525Zjx

The note tracked a one-time setup step: `everos-cloud` was published from
github.com/evermemos/everos-cloud-python through 0.4.1, so releasing from this
repo required adding a Trusted Publisher for it to the existing PyPI project.
That's done — 1.0.0 shipped from this workflow — so the note is spent, and now
that the repo is public it reads as a stale internal memo.

The surrounding comment already states the standing requirement (a Trusted
Publisher must point at this repo + workflow), which is the part worth keeping.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LdqRBYsdEoyC45w9525Zjx
@dani1005
dani1005 merged commit 4e5ab19 into v1 Aug 1, 2026
1 check passed
@dani1005
dani1005 deleted the chore/drop-publish-note branch August 1, 2026 01:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant