Guard eager OpenFeature init and add detailed /ffe/evaluate for Go agentless configuration contract - #7580
Draft
pavlokhrebto wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
…entless configuration contract
Contributor
|
|
This was referenced Aug 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
FFL-2695 tracks the Go agentless configuration-source implementation in dd-trace-go. Until that lands, the parametric app's
/ffe/startand/ffe/evaluatecontract must match the one already implemented for Python (#7411), sotests/parametric/test_ffe/test_configuration_sources.pycan run against a dev build of dd-trace-go and fail for the right reason.Changes
main.go: skip eager OpenFeature provider init when anyDD_FEATURE_FLAGS_*config env var is set. Leave setup to/ffe/start.ffe.go:/ffe/startbuilds and sets the provider once, guarded bysync.Once. It returns 500 with an error body on failure./ffe/evaluateuses the*ValueDetailsAPIs pervariationType. It returns{value, reason, errorCode}. On error it falls back to{value: default, reason: "ERROR"}.Workflow
🚀 Once your PR is reviewed and the CI green, you can merge it!
🛟 #apm-shared-testing 🛟
Reviewer checklist
tests/ormanifests/is modified ? I have the approval from R&P teambuild-XXX-imagelabel is present