Skip to content

Build metadata#7137

Draft
nccatoni wants to merge 7 commits into
rochdev/weblog-build-metadatafrom
nccatoni/local-build
Draft

Build metadata#7137
nccatoni wants to merge 7 commits into
rochdev/weblog-build-metadatafrom
nccatoni/local-build

Conversation

@nccatoni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Motivation

Changes

Workflow

  1. ⚠️ Create your PR as draft ⚠️
  2. Work on you PR until the CI passes
  3. Mark it as ready for review
    • Test logic is modified? -> Get a review from RFC owner.
    • Framework is modified, or non obvious usage of it -> get a review from R&P team

🚀 Once your PR is reviewed and the CI green, you can merge it!

🛟 #apm-shared-testing 🛟

Reviewer checklist

  • Anything but tests/ or manifests/ is modified ? I have the approval from R&P team
  • A docker base image is modified?
    • the relevant build-XXX-image label is present
  • A scenario is added, removed or renamed?

rochdev and others added 5 commits June 12, 2026 15:56
Introduce {name}.weblog.json companion files alongside Dockerfiles.
When require_build is false, the weblog is excluded from
build_end_to_end's matrix, which already skips the job when the
list is empty. Set all Node.js regular weblogs to require_build=false.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
When require_build=False, artifact_name must use the pre-existing
binaries_artifact instead of a unique per-run name, since
build_end_to_end is skipped and never uploads that artifact.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
require_build controls parallel_weblogs (pre-build job).
needs_local_build controls weblog_build_required in run_end_to_end.
Non-Dockerfile weblogs (integration frameworks, go_proxies,
otel_collector) set needs_local_build=False; Dockerfile-based
weblogs default to True, so they still build locally even when
require_build=False skips the pre-build job.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
require_build now consistently means 'needs Docker build' (True for
all Dockerfile weblogs, False for non-Dockerfile). require_prebuild
controls parallel_weblogs membership and _get_build_time. Metadata
key renamed from require_build to require_prebuild accordingly.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

utils/build/docker/java/build.yml                                       @DataDog/apm-java @DataDog/asm-java @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/build/docker/nodejs/build.yml                                     @DataDog/dd-trace-js @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/build/docker/python/build.yml                                     @DataDog/apm-python @DataDog/asm-python @DataDog/system-tests-core
tests/test_the_test/test_ci_orchestrator.py                             @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/scripts/ci_orchestrators/workflow_data.py                         @DataDog/system-tests-core

@nccatoni nccatoni force-pushed the nccatoni/local-build branch 2 times, most recently from 05db838 to 56966f5 Compare June 15, 2026 12:06
@nccatoni nccatoni force-pushed the nccatoni/local-build branch from 56966f5 to 2976ce1 Compare June 15, 2026 12:07
@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pipelines  Tests

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 2 Pipeline jobs failed

Testing the test | System Tests (dotnet, prod) / End-to-end #1 / uds 1   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

Testing the test | all-jobs-are-green   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 02d85c1 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@rochdev rochdev force-pushed the rochdev/weblog-build-metadata branch from 8d7e3e7 to 2cc3e61 Compare June 15, 2026 14:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants