SNMP: comment-only change to cisco-catalyst profile (CI baseline, do not merge)

[ian28223]

What does this PR do?

Adds comment-only lines to three profile YAML files in snmp/datadog_checks/snmp/data/default_profiles/:

• cisco-catalyst.yaml
• _cisco-catalyst.yaml
• cisco-sb.yaml

No behavior change. No content change. Just one comment line in each file so the CI test selector schedules the same e2e tests that PR #23498 triggers.

Motivation

Diagnostic baseline for AGENT-15682 and PR #23498. PR #23498 saw failures in test_e2e_snmp_listener, test_e2e_core.py::*, test_e2e_core_metadata.py::test_e2e_core_metadata_cisco_catalyst, and all of test_e2e_core_profiles/. Many of those tests cover profiles entirely unrelated to the cisco-catalyst / cisco-sb changes in #23498, suggesting environmental flake.

The initial single-file version of this PR confirmed test_e2e_snmp_listener is environmental (failed identically on both PRs), but the test_e2e_core_profiles/ tests were skipped on baseline because the file scope didn't trigger their selection. This expanded baseline touches the same three files as #23498, so the same tests should be scheduled and we get a like-for-like comparison.

Not for merge. Close after CI signal is observed.

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
• Add the `qa/skip-qa` label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
• If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the `backport/` label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

[datadog-prod-us1-6]

   

✨ Fix all issues with BitsAI

🛑 Gate Violations

🎯 1 Code Coverage issue detected

A Total coverage percentage gate may be blocking this PR.

• Overall coverage for service snmp: 26.22% (threshold: 30.00%)

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 6 Pipeline jobs failed

PR | test / test (linux, ubuntu-22.04, snmp, SNMP (py3.13-false), py3.13-false) / SNMP (py3.13-false)-py3.13-false     

🔄 Retry job. This looks flaky and may succeed on retry.

Max retries exceeded while trying to resolve 'ddintegrations.blob.core.windows.net'.

PR | test / test (linux, ubuntu-22.04, snmp, SNMP (py3.13-true), py3.13-true) / SNMP (py3.13-true)-py3.13-true     

🔄 Retry job. This looks flaky and may succeed on retry.

Name resolution failed for 'ddintegrations.blob.core.windows.net'.

PR | test / test-minimum-base-package (linux, ubuntu-22.04, snmp, SNMP (py3.13-false), py3.13-false) / minimum-base-package-SNMP (py3.13-false)-py3.13-false     

🔄 Retry job. This looks flaky and may succeed on retry.

Connection error: Failed to resolve 'ddintegrations.blob.core.windows.net'.

View all 6 failed jobs.

🧪 20 Tests failed in 1 job

PR | run  

test_bulk_table from test_check.py   (Fix with Cursor)

HTTPSConnectionPool(host='ddintegrations.blob.core.windows.net', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /snmp/cisco-3850.snmprec (Caused by NameResolutionError("HTTPSConnection(host='ddintegrations.blob.core.windows.net', port=443): Failed to resolve 'ddintegrations.blob.core.windows.net' ([Errno -2] Name or service not known)"))

test_cast_metrics from test_check.py   (Fix with Cursor)

HTTPSConnectionPool(host='ddintegrations.blob.core.windows.net', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /snmp/cisco-3850.snmprec (Caused by NameResolutionError("HTTPSConnection(host='ddintegrations.blob.core.windows.net', port=443): Failed to resolve 'ddintegrations.blob.core.windows.net' ([Errno -2] Name or service not known)"))

View all 20 test failures

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 18.30% (-69.63%)

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: ca6164d | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.06%. Comparing base (3bce4ec) to head (08ee6bf).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[dd-octo-sts]

Validation Report

Validation	Description	Status
qa-label	Validate the pull request declares whether it needs QA for the next Agent release	❌

Run ddev validate all changed --fix to attempt to auto-fix supported validations.

Passed validations (20)

Validation	Description	Status
agent-reqs	Verify check versions match the Agent requirements file	✅
ci	Validate CI configuration and code coverage settings	✅
codeowners	Validate every integration has a CODEOWNERS entry	✅
config	Validate default configuration files against spec.yaml	✅
dep	Verify dependency pins are consistent and Agent-compatible	✅
http	Validate integrations use the HTTP wrapper correctly	✅
imports	Validate check imports do not use deprecated modules	✅
integration-style	Validate check code style conventions	✅
jmx-metrics	Validate JMX metrics definition files and config	✅
labeler	Validate PR labeler config matches integration directories	✅
legacy-signature	Validate no integration uses the legacy Agent check signature	✅
license-headers	Validate Python files have proper license headers	✅
licenses	Validate third-party license attribution list	✅
metadata	Validate metadata.csv metric definitions	✅
models	Validate configuration data models match spec.yaml	✅
openmetrics	Validate OpenMetrics integrations disable the metric limit	✅
package	Validate Python package metadata and naming	✅
readmes	Validate README files have required sections	✅
saved-views	Validate saved view JSON file structure and fields	✅
version	Validate version consistency between package and changelog	✅

View full run