[DOCS-13867] Fix DatadogProviderConfiguration constructor in Expo setup code sample#35855
Open
[DOCS-13867] Fix DatadogProviderConfiguration constructor in Expo setup code sample#35855
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
Architecture
The code sample used invalid JavaScript syntax, passing configuration properties as flat positional arguments instead of wrapping them in an options object as the SDK constructor expects. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
iadjivon
force-pushed
the
ida.adjivon/DOCS-13867-rum-react-native-code-change
branch
from
5c740c5 to
20fe493
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do? What is the motivation?
Fixes DOCS-13867
The Expo setup code sample for
DatadogProviderConfigurationused invalid JavaScript syntax — configuration properties (site,service,verbosity,rumConfiguration, etc.) were passed as flat positional arguments instead of being wrapped in anoptionsobject as the constructor expects.Constructor signature (from SDK source):
Changes:
trackingConsentas the 3rd argumentsite,service,verbosity,rumConfiguration,logsConfiguration, andtraceConfigurationinside anoptionsobject (4th argument)Verified against:
CoreConfigurationconstructor signatureMerge instructions
Merge readiness:
Additional notes
🤖 Generated with Claude Code