Bug in iNKA covariance#291
Conversation
|
@cailmdaley, following #286, this PR is ready for a review. |
|
The fix is correct. I traced the decoupling end to end. The coupled analytic noise from Nicola et al. is now decoupled with the correct workspace. Coupled and decoupled quantities are used consistently downstream. Cross-bins correctly get zero noise bias. Approve. One request, on a pre-existing issue this fix now touches: the signal and noise grids are misaligned by one multipole. — Claude on behalf of Cail |
|
The best I found to fix this is to add a zero monopole and drop the last value of the fiducial. |
f8d814c
into
feature/sp_validation-extend-to-tomography
Related to Issue #290 , this PR fixes a bug in the iNKA covariance. The analytical based noise bias computation was missing a decoupling step leading to a misestimated noise bias and likely larger error bars. The updated functions is running for cross-validation with Gaussian simulations from #286 .
Ready to be merge as soon as the cross-validation is performed. In the meantime, design and runtime review is welcomed.