-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
Feature/enhanced workflow validation #229
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
pradeeban
merged 8 commits into
ControlCore-Project:dev
from
Sahil-u07:feature/enhanced-workflow-validation
Feb 15, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ceccbac
Enhance workflow validation with source file and port checks
Sahil-u07 a39e30a
Address Copilot review feedback
Sahil-u07 ad0f393
Fix
Sahil-u07 f862b9b
Merge upstream/dev into feature/enhanced-workflow-validation
Sahil-u07 59c76b6
Merge upstream/dev
Sahil-u07 8cc3d50
Remove temporary helper scripts
Sahil-u07 ab15e7a
Fix syntax warning: escape backslash in docstring
Sahil-u07 5ffd847
Properly merge upstream/dev
Sahil-u07 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Port validation tests cover reserved-port warnings and same-port conflicts, but there’s no test for the stated port-range requirement (1–65535). After adding the <1 check (and optionally asserting the existing >65535 behavior), add tests for port 0 (should fail) and a port > 65535 (should fail) to lock in the intended behavior.