Skip to content

docs: add Docker FAQ to troubleshooting overview page#1245

Open
lin-bot23 wants to merge 3 commits into
Comfy-Org:mainfrom
lin-bot23:analytics-fix/2026-07-10-docker-faq
Open

docs: add Docker FAQ to troubleshooting overview page#1245
lin-bot23 wants to merge 3 commits into
Comfy-Org:mainfrom
lin-bot23:analytics-fix/2026-07-10-docker-faq

Conversation

@lin-bot23

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Based on Mintlify AI Q&A analytics. Users repeatedly ask "docker" across multiple pages (Jul 4-5, multiple languages). The existing Docker notice was only hidden on the manual install page, invisible to users asking from the homepage or other pages.

Changes

  • EN: troubleshooting/overview.mdx — added a Frequently Asked Questions section with a Docker FAQ entry
  • ZH/JA/KO: sync translations

Source
Mintlify AI Assistant analytics data (2026-07-04/05)

Checklist

  • English + zh/ja/ko updated
  • PR created by Hermes Agent (bot), do not merge

Based on Mintlify AI analytics data showing users repeatedly ask
about Docker (appeared across Jul 4-5, multiple languages).
The existing Docker notice was only on the manual install page,
making it invisible to users asking from other pages.

- EN: troubleshooting/overview.mdx — add Frequently Asked Questions
  section with Docker FAQ
- ZH/JA/KO: sync translations
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@lin-bot23, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 19 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 9a1b68f2-0014-473c-856a-2a86dc516d7e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9e955fb and 2ca24ea.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • troubleshooting/overview.mdx
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Changes

Docker FAQ

Layer / File(s) Summary
Docker FAQ guidance
troubleshooting/overview.mdx, ja/troubleshooting/overview.mdx, ko/troubleshooting/overview.mdx, zh/troubleshooting/overview.mdx
Adds localized FAQ entries describing Docker image availability, community-image support status, and local or cloud installation links.

Ideogram 3.0 Guides

Layer / File(s) Summary
Ideogram guide setup and overview
ja/tutorials/partner-nodes/ideogram/ideogram-v3.mdx, ko/tutorials/partner-nodes/ideogram/ideogram-v3.mdx, zh/tutorials/partner-nodes/ideogram/ideogram-v3.mdx
Adds localized page metadata, guide components, and an overview of Ideogram 3.0 modes.
Ideogram workflow instructions
ja/tutorials/partner-nodes/ideogram/ideogram-v3.mdx, ko/tutorials/partner-nodes/ideogram/ideogram-v3.mdx, zh/tutorials/partner-nodes/ideogram/ideogram-v3.mdx
Documents text-to-image workflow execution and output saving, while marking image editing as pending updates.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@ja/troubleshooting/overview.mdx`:
- Line 375: The Japanese, Korean, and Chinese translations omit the English
source’s “on Linux” qualifier. Verify whether the restriction is intentional,
then update the corresponding localized troubleshooting text consistently across
all three locales to include the Linux qualifier or align the English source and
translations if it is not intended.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: fec7403c-a5e2-4a7d-a18f-a1a554f86d9e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 586ecc7 and 9e955fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • ja/troubleshooting/overview.mdx
  • ja/tutorials/partner-nodes/ideogram/ideogram-v3.mdx
  • ko/troubleshooting/overview.mdx
  • ko/tutorials/partner-nodes/ideogram/ideogram-v3.mdx
  • troubleshooting/overview.mdx
  • zh/troubleshooting/overview.mdx
  • zh/tutorials/partner-nodes/ideogram/ideogram-v3.mdx

Comment thread ja/troubleshooting/overview.mdx Outdated

ComfyUI は公式の Docker イメージを提供していません。コンテナで ComfyUI を実行したい場合は、[Docker Hub](https://hub.docker.com) でコミュニティ管理のイメージ(例:`lecode-official/comfyui-docker`)を検索してください。**これらは公式の ComfyUI イメージではなく**、ComfyUI チームはサポートしていません。自己責任で使用してください。

ローカルインストールの場合は、[手動インストールガイド](/ja/installation/manual_install) を参照してください。クラウド利用の場合は、[Comfy Cloud](/ja/get_started/cloud) をご覧ください。

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Translation omits "on Linux" qualifier from the English source.

The English version says "For local installation on Linux, follow the Manual Installation Guide," but the Japanese translation says "ローカルインストールの場合は" without the Linux qualifier. The Korean and Chinese translations also omit it. Decide whether the "on Linux" restriction is intentional and ensure all locales are consistent.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@ja/troubleshooting/overview.mdx` at line 375, The Japanese, Korean, and
Chinese translations omit the English source’s “on Linux” qualifier. Verify
whether the restriction is intentional, then update the corresponding localized
troubleshooting text consistently across all three locales to include the Linux
qualifier or align the English source and translations if it is not intended.

Remove ja/zh/ko troubleshooting/overview.mdx FAQ additions and
ideogram-v3 translation files (belong in separate translation sync).
Replace duplicate Docker FAQ text with reusable snippet import.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant