Skip to content

Introduce standard 'for' loop in iteration section#1709

Open
saikrishna488 wants to merge 1 commit intoCodeYourFuture:mainfrom
saikrishna488:patch-1
Open

Introduce standard 'for' loop in iteration section#1709
saikrishna488 wants to merge 1 commit intoCodeYourFuture:mainfrom
saikrishna488:patch-1

Conversation

@saikrishna488
Copy link

@saikrishna488 saikrishna488 commented Jan 20, 2026

Added explanation and syntax for the standard 'for' loop.

What does this change?

Common Content?

  • Block/s

Common Theme?

  • Yes

Issue number: #issue-number

Org Content?

Module | Sprint | Page Type | Block Type

Checklist

Who needs to know about this?

Added explanation and syntax for the standard 'for' loop.
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 20, 2026

👷 Deploy request for cyf-piscine pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 42fa0f2

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 20, 2026

👷 Deploy request for cyf-curriculum pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 42fa0f2

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 20, 2026

👷 Deploy request for cyf-launch pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 42fa0f2

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 20, 2026

👷 Deploy request for cyf-common pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 42fa0f2

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 20, 2026

👷 Deploy request for cyf-sdc pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 42fa0f2

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 20, 2026

👷 Deploy request for cyf-tracks pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 42fa0f2

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 20, 2026

👷 Deploy request for cyf-itd pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 42fa0f2

@Poonam-raj Poonam-raj self-requested a review January 28, 2026 16:58
Copy link
Contributor

@Poonam-raj Poonam-raj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Sai, is this linked to the other PR you made which had a strong explanation of iteration? Feels like this overwrites or was a previous version but isn't necessary anymore?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: 📋 Backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants