Skip to content

chore(readme): model counts become models.chatVisible markers - #72

Merged
VickyXAI merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/stale-model-counts
Sep 29, 2026
Merged

VickyXAI merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/stale-model-counts

Conversation

@VickyXAI

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hand-typed model counts in README.md, checked against https://blockrun.ai/brand/numbers.json (chatVisible 82).

Line Old → new What it claims Form
FAQ "What is blockrun-llm?" (~L1850) 43+ large language models → 82 BlockRun chat catalog (chatVisible) marker br:models.chatVisible
intro blockquote (L3) 80+ large language models → 82 same. It wasn't stale yet, but it was a hand-typed floor that would drift marker br:models.chatVisible

Checks: node scripts/sync-brand-numbers.mjs --check passes (the same command CI runs).

Heads-up, not in this PR: the "Available free models" table (~L82) and the free routing-profile row (~L231) still name the old NVIDIA free lineup (step-3.7-flash, mistral-nemotron, nemotron-nano-9b/12b, gpt-oss). The live $0 set is nemotron-3.5-lightning, nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning, nemotron-3-ultra-550b, llama-3.2-11b-vision, cohere/north-mini-code and poolside/laguna-xs-2.1. That's a content rewrite that needs checking against the SDK's own router tables, so it's left for a separate change.

This repo only allows squash merges. Squash-merge this PR.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

- FAQ "What is blockrun-llm?": 43+ -> marker (82)
- intro blockquote: 80+ -> marker (82), so it cannot drift again

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@VickyXAI
VickyXAI merged commit 6fafbcf into main Sep 29, 2026
4 checks passed
VickyXAI added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2026
- FAQ "What is blockrun-llm?": 43+ -> marker (82)
- intro blockquote: 80+ -> marker (82), so it cannot drift again

Co-authored-by: 1bcMax <viewitter@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant