Skip to content

{CI} Sync squad mapping labels from ADO Wiki to resourceManagement.yml - #10245

Open
Azure CLI Bot (azclibot) wants to merge 1 commit into
Azure:mainfrom
azclibot:sync_squad_mapping_341060
Open

{CI} Sync squad mapping labels from ADO Wiki to resourceManagement.yml#10245
Azure CLI Bot (azclibot) wants to merge 1 commit into
Azure:mainfrom
azclibot:sync_squad_mapping_341060

Conversation

@azclibot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR synchronizes squad labels in resourceManagement.yml based on the Squad Mapping ADO wiki page.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 23, 2026 16:27
@azure-client-tools-bot-prd

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi Azure CLI Bot (@azclibot),
Please write the description of changes which can be perceived by customers into HISTORY.rst.
If you want to release a new extension version, please update the version in pyproject.toml (or setup.py, if the extension has not migrated yet) as well.

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the repo’s PR auto-triage policy to align squad routing with the ADO “Squad Mapping” source, ensuring AKS/AIManager-related PRs also notify the Observability squad and receive the corresponding squad label.

Changes:

  • Add Azure/act-observability-squad as an additional requested reviewer for the [aks aimanager] auto-assign rule.
  • Add the act-observability-squad label to the same rule to keep labeling consistent with reviewer routing.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@yonzhan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

CI

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants