Skip to content

chore(deps): update nvidia-dcgm (patch)#8659

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm
Open

chore(deps): update nvidia-dcgm (patch)#8659
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
dcgm-exporter patch 4.8.2-1.azl34.8.2-3.azl3
dcgm-exporter patch 4.8.2-ubuntu24.04u14.8.2-ubuntu24.04u3
dcgm-exporter patch 4.8.2-ubuntu22.04u14.8.2-ubuntu22.04u3

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 8, 2026 14:54
@renovate renovate Bot added the renovate This pull request was created by renovate label Jun 8, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot assigned djsly Jun 8, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@renovate renovate Bot requested review from djsly, ganeshkumarashok and surajssd June 8, 2026 14:54
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the components This pull request updates cached components on Linux or Windows VHDs label Jun 8, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update nvidia-dcgm to v4.8.2-ubuntu22.04u2 chore(deps): update nvidia-dcgm (patch) Jun 8, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from 1c34d5c to 51e8bdd Compare June 8, 2026 15:14
@djsly

djsly commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

AgentBaker Linux PR gate — E2E failure (mixed: 3 leaves shared infra; 1 ACL leaf likely on main)

  • Run: 167166471 (failed)
  • Failed: Run AgentBaker E2E → AzureCLI exit 1 (DONE 457 tests, 95 skipped, 5 failures in 1646.77s)

Group A — shared infra/test-fixture issue, NOT this PR (3 leaves):

  • Test_Ubuntu2204Gen2_ImagePullIdentityBinding_NetworkIsolated/{default (6.57s), scriptless_nbc (0.00s)}test_helpers.go:227 🔴 empty error, plus the parent container.
  • Same sub-7s empty-error shape has now hit 5 unrelated PRs in 48h (this PR, #8600, #8330, #8654, #8653). Confirmed systemic — needs NodeSIG-dev / E2E-infra triage of the ImagePullIdentityBinding_NetworkIsolated private-cluster/ACR-private-endpoint precondition.

Group B — ACL FIPS TL leaf, very likely existing main regression (2 leaves):

  • Test_ACLGen2FIPSTL/scriptless_nbc (265.83s) — validation.go:345 🔴: wireserver check "wireserver port 80 goalstate": unexpected curl exit code "0" (want 28 timeout or 7 refused) (plus root container).
  • The test expects WireServer port 80 to be blocked (curl exit 28=timeout or 7=refused) but got 0 (HTTP 200 reachable). That's an ACL FIPS TL firewall/network policy assertion. This PR (nvidia-dcgm patch bump in parts/common/components.json) touches GPU package versions only and has no path to ACL networking. Strongly suggests an existing ACL FIPS TL regression on main, not caused by this PR.

Confidence: HIGH that this PR is not the cause of either failure group.

Recommended next action:

  1. Rerun the failing job; do not block this PR on Group A.
  2. NodeSIG-dev: file a tracker on the ACL FIPS TL wireserver-block regression in validation.go:345 (the test expectation flipped, or the ACL network policy unit shipped in the latest VHD no longer blocks WireServer); investigate against main head independently of any specific PR.
  3. NodeSIG-dev / E2E-infra: triage the ImagePullIdentityBinding_NetworkIsolated fixture (sub-7s empty failures across multiple unrelated PRs).

Strongest alternative (less likely): transient ACR-private-endpoint outage for Group A + intermittent ACL firewall rule timing for Group B — refuted because each pattern is now reproducing deterministically on every recent PR build.

Posted by Clawpilot AgentBaker gate detective.

@surajssd surajssd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do not merge, until renovate also adds support for Azure Linux. Once this is merged: #8660 I don't have to manually say that we should not merge this.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from 51e8bdd to f4fe0e0 Compare June 9, 2026 07:03
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 9, 2026 07:03

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from f4fe0e0 to 6310c4d Compare June 10, 2026 03:01
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 10, 2026 06:02
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from 6310c4d to d445cbf Compare June 10, 2026 06:02

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@aks-node-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

AgentBaker Linux PR gate — 236-failure run: shared cluster fleet outage continues (test-infra, NOT this PR)

  • Run: 167422694 (failed)
  • Failed task: Run AgentBaker E2E (full 60-minute timeout consumed)
  • Test summary: DONE 402 tests, 95 skipped, 236 failures in ~3616s (~59% failure rate; 0 fwupd hits)

Same shared cluster fleet outage affecting every concurrent PR in this window: 123× get or create cluster: failed to wait for cluster abe2e-kubenet-v5-150ee to be ready: context deadline exceeded plus 36× ResourceGroupDeletionBlocked on shared MC RGs. Earlier overnight runs hit ~11 min; current runs consume the full 60-min E2E timeout, indicating the fleet is worse, not recovering.

Cross-PR pattern this morning: PR #8652 build 167419663, PR #8679 build 167421198, PR #8294 build 167422687, and concurrent PRs all hit identical 236-fail / cluster-not-ready signature.

Build-vs-test: test-infra (shared cluster fleet outage), NOT product, NOT PR-caused.
This PR's exposure check: nvidia-dcgm renovate patch bump (GPU monitoring). No path to shared test cluster lifecycle.
Confidence: HIGH that PR #8659 is not the cause.

Recommended next action / owner: ⚠️ E2E infra / NodeSIG-dev — urgent shared cluster fleet restoration required (abe2e-kubenet-v5-*, abe2e-latest-kubernetes-version-v2-*, abe2e-azure-networkisolated-v2-*, abe2e-azure-v4-*, abe2e-azure-bootstrapprofile-cache-v2-*); clear ResourceGroupDeletionBlocked locks. PR gate is effectively offline until restored. PR author: rerun once fleet recovers.

Posted by Clawpilot AgentBaker gate detective.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from d445cbf to 313d630 Compare June 10, 2026 15:51
@aks-node-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

AgentBaker Linux PR gate — 3 distinct E2E failures, all test-infra / shared-cluster (NOT this PR)

  • Run: 167493131
  • Failed job: Run AgentBaker E2E (all VHD builds passed)
  • Failed scenarios: Test_AzureLinux_Skip_Binary_Cleanup/{default,scriptless_nbc}, Test_AzureLinuxV3_CustomSysctls/default, Test_Ubuntu2204_HTTPSProxy_PrivateDNS/{default,scriptless_nbc} (5 subtests across 3 scenarios)

Detective summary — two independent signatures

(1) wireserver-blocking-validator-assertion — both AzureLinux scenarios on shared cluster abe2e-kubenet-v5-150ee:

🔴 FAIL: wireserver check "wireserver port 80 goalstate":
        unexpected curl exit code "0" (want 28 timeout or 7 refused)

The validator asserts that the node's iptables rule blocks egress to 168.63.129.16:80. iptables shows the DROP rule is present (DROP ... 168.63.129.16 tcp dpt:80), but the test's curl still returns exit 0 — the rule isn't taking effect for the test's connection (likely matched against a stale conntrack/TIME_WAIT entry; logs show pre-existing 168.63.129.16 flows in conntrack). This is the same signature as build 167348372; second occurrence. Wiki: wireserver-blocking-validator-assertion.

(2) httpsproxy-fixture-proxy-unreachable — both HTTPSProxy_PrivateDNS subtests on shared cluster abe2e-azure-network-v4-ce2ad:

VMExtensionProvisioningError ... vmssCSE exit 99
W: Failed to fetch https://packages.microsoft.com/ubuntu/22.04/prod/dists/jammy/InRelease
   Could not connect to 10.14.0.193:8888 (10.14.0.193). - connect (111: Connection refused)

The CSE retries apt-get update 10 times against the scenario's HTTP proxy at 10.14.0.193:8888; the proxy endpoint refuses every attempt and CSE exits 99. The proxy is part of the test fixture (private DNS / HTTPS proxy scenario infra), not anything this PR touches. New signature.

Classification: Test infrastructure / shared-cluster issues. Neither failure is reachable from changes in PR #8659 (renovate nvidia-dcgm patch — does not touch wireserver/iptables, CSE, apt sources, or the proxy fixture).

Confidence: High for both (multiple subtests, identical signatures, no PR-relevant changed files, all VHD builds passed).

Strongest alternative theory: Recent change to aks-node CSE / iptables wiring that lets the wireserver block "miss" — less likely because the rule is present and counters match expected DROP behavior in the chain dump; the leak is at the conntrack/TIME_WAIT layer pre-dating the validator's curl. For the proxy: a transient ARM/MMS issue affecting 10.14.0.193. Less likely than fixture-side because the proxy is the only target refusing connections; the cluster, the VM, the AKS extension framework, and the AKS managed runtime all succeeded.

Recommended next action / owner:

  • Wireserver-blocking validator: SIG Node Lifecycle test-code owner — make the validator tolerate pre-existing conntrack entries (curl with --local-port / fresh tuple), or flush conntrack for 168.63.129.16 before the curl probe. Pattern is now seen on two distinct PR runs and one cluster fixture.
  • HTTPSProxy fixture: AgentBaker E2E test-infra — the proxy mirror behind 10.14.0.193:8888 on shared cluster abe2e-azure-network-v4-ce2ad is unreachable; check the proxy pod/daemon health on that fixture.
  • No PR change required. Recommend rerun of the failed leg only.

Evidence used: failed task log (5 === FAIL markers across 3 distinct scenarios on 2 distinct shared clusters), all VHD builds succeeded, no changed file in PR #8659 touches wireserver/CSE/proxy code.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from 551d5fc to 17cf3b4 Compare June 18, 2026 22:56

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from 17cf3b4 to 9d38eb2 Compare June 19, 2026 19:16
@aks-node-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

AgentBaker Linux gate detective

Run: https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_build/results?buildId=168659199
Failed job/stage/task: Run AgentBaker E2E
First failing step/test: NetworkIsolated cluster reuse of abe2e-azure-networkisolated-v3-d6cc9

RCA: This is the recurring NetworkIsolated shared-cluster cleanup flake. E2E found existing cluster �be2e-azure-networkisolated-v3-d6cc9 already Failed/Deleting and failed before PR-specific scenario validation. Prior evidence for this same cluster shows ResourceGroupDeletionBlocked / InUseNetworkSecurityGroupCannotBeDeleted on �be2e-networkisolated-securityGroup still attached to the shared VNET subnet.

Confidence: High. Corroborated by timeline/status, Run AgentBaker E2E log 538, unrelated PRs hitting the same cluster/signature, and the existing repair item #38506740.

Strongest alternative: the nvidia-dcgm Renovate payload caused E2E provisioning; less likely because the failure occurs while acquiring a pre-existing shared NetworkIsolated cluster already in bad lifecycle state.

Recommended owner/action: AgentBaker E2E test-infra owner: clean/quarantine �be2e-azure-networkisolated-v3-d6cc9, remove the stuck NSG/subnet association, and harden shared-cluster cleanup/retry.

Wiki signature:
etworkisolated-shared-cluster-delete-blocked-inuse-nsg (source of truth)

@aks-node-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

AgentBaker Linux gate detective

Run: https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_build/results?buildId=168575141
Failed job/stage/task: $(System.Collections.Hashtable.job)
First failing step/test: $(System.Collections.Hashtable.first)

RCA: E2E infra failure: multiple shared clusters were already Failed/Deleting and cleanup was blocked by ResourceGroupDeletionBlocked / InUseRouteTableCannotBeDeleted on route table abe2e-fw-rt. This is not caused by the nvidia-dcgm Renovate change.

Confidence: High for the primary signature. Corroborated by timeline/status, focused failed logs, associated changes, and the flakiness wiki before publishing.

Strongest alternative: nvidia-dcgm package update caused E2E failure; less likely because the failure is pre-validation shared-cluster lifecycle state across unrelated clusters.

Recommended owner/action: AgentBaker E2E test-infra: clean stale shared clusters and unblock route table dependencies.

Wiki signature: $(System.Collections.Hashtable.sig) (source of truth)

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 19, 2026 21:59
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from 9d38eb2 to 616997f Compare June 19, 2026 21:59

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@aks-node-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

AgentBaker Linux gate detective

Run: https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_build/results?buildId=168775762
Failed job/stage/task: Run AgentBaker E2E
Summary: E2E emitted slow node/pod readiness warnings and then failed with the same broad node-readiness timeout class (kube.go:199 / panic.go:694) seen across unrelated PRs.
Likely cause/signature: known shared E2E cluster/fleet readiness flake, shared-cluster-fleet-outage.
Confidence: medium-high.
Strongest alternative: PR #8659's nvidia-dcgm update caused node readiness regressions; less likely because the concurrent burst spans unrelated dependency PRs and scenario families.
Recommended next action/owner: E2E shared-cluster infra owners; continue repair item https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_workitems/edit/38373323.
Wiki: shared-cluster-fleet-outage — https://dev.azure.com/msazure/09706533-03bf-4b43-9a9b-b49c75429646/_wiki/wikis/ed4a85e9-1085-4151-a39b-2753523eba2b?pagePath=%2FAKS%2FSIGs%20and%20Teams%2FAKS%20Components%2FSIG%3A%20Node%20Lifecycle%2FAI%20Agent%20Knowledge%2FAgentBaker%20Gate%20PR%20Pipeline%20Flakiness

@aks-node-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

AgentBaker Linux gate detective

Run: https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_build/results?buildId=168796845
Failed job/stage/task: Run AgentBaker E2E
Summary: E2E hit the same shared dual-stack cluster/fleet outage: �be2e-azure-overlay-dualstack-v6-4a24b was unexpectedly Deleting, with additional slow pod readiness and NetworkUnavailable=True / Waiting for cloud routes symptoms. Concurrent CIS regressions are separate.
Likely cause/signature: shared-cluster-fleet-outage.
Confidence: high.
Strongest alternative: PR #8659's nvidia-dcgm update caused the failure; less likely because failures are non-GPU, cross-scenario, and match unrelated PRs in the same wave.
Recommended next action/owner: E2E shared-cluster infra owners; continue repair item https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_workitems/edit/38373323.
Wiki: shared-cluster-fleet-outage — https://dev.azure.com/msazure/09706533-03bf-4b43-9a9b-b49c75429646/_wiki/wikis/ed4a85e9-1085-4151-a39b-2753523eba2b?pagePath=%2FAKS%2FSIGs%20and%20Teams%2FAKS%20Components%2FSIG%3A%20Node%20Lifecycle%2FAI%20Agent%20Knowledge%2FAgentBaker%20Gate%20PR%20Pipeline%20Flakiness

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from 616997f to d56e0a5 Compare June 20, 2026 21:55
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 21, 2026 06:14
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from d56e0a5 to f8308ed Compare June 21, 2026 06:14

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from f8308ed to a1fb73b Compare June 21, 2026 17:54
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 21, 2026 20:50
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from a1fb73b to 650c82e Compare June 21, 2026 20:50

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@aks-node-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

AgentBaker Linux gate detective

Run: https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_build/results?buildId=168928859
Failed job/stage/task: Run AgentBaker E2E
Summary: E2E failed in Test_Ubuntu2204_HTTPSProxy_PrivateDNS/default with preparing AKS node failed /
unning scenario failed. In the same outage window this most closely matches the known shared fleet/node-readiness signature.
Likely cause/signature: probable shared-cluster-fleet-outage.
Confidence: medium; the fetched excerpt did not include explicit deleting/missing node-RG lines for this exact run.
Strongest alternative: PR #8659's nvidia-dcgm update caused the failure; less likely because the failing scenario is HTTPSProxy/PrivateDNS, not DCGM-specific, and neighboring runs show shared infra failures.
Recommended next action/owner: E2E shared-cluster infra owners; continue repair item https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_workitems/edit/38373323.
Wiki: shared-cluster-fleet-outage — https://dev.azure.com/msazure/09706533-03bf-4b43-9a9b-b49c75429646/_wiki/wikis/ed4a85e9-1085-4151-a39b-2753523eba2b?pagePath=%2FAKS%2FSIGs%20and%20Teams%2FAKS%20Components%2FSIG%3A%20Node%20Lifecycle%2FAI%20Agent%20Knowledge%2FAgentBaker%20Gate%20PR%20Pipeline%20Flakiness

@aks-node-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

AgentBaker Linux gate detective

Run: https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_build/results?buildId=168921966
Failed job/stage/task: Run AgentBaker E2E / Test_Version_Consistency_GPU_Managed_Components
Summary: GPU managed component version consistency failed immediately after this PR's nvidia-dcgm update; pod readiness warning appears secondary.
Likely cause/signature: gpu-managed-components-version-consistency-nvidia-dcgm.
Confidence: high.
Strongest alternative: infra/pod readiness flake; less likely because the first semantic failure is version consistency and aligns with the PR change.
Recommended next action/owner: GPU managed-components owner: align DCGM version references/expected metadata/test data.
Wiki: gpu-managed-components-version-consistency-nvidia-dcgmhttps://dev.azure.com/msazure/09706533-03bf-4b43-9a9b-b49c75429646/_wiki/wikis/ed4a85e9-1085-4151-a39b-2753523eba2b?pagePath=%2FAKS%2FSIGs%20and%20Teams%2FAKS%20Components%2FSIG%3A%20Node%20Lifecycle%2FAI%20Agent%20Knowledge%2FAgentBaker%20Gate%20PR%20Pipeline%20Flakiness

@aks-node-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

AgentBaker Linux gate detective

Run: https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_build/results?buildId=168889354
Failed job/stage/task: Run AgentBaker E2E / Test_Ubuntu2404Gen2/scriptless_nbc
Summary: Node became Ready but retained NetworkUnavailable=True / Waiting for cloud routes; later pod exec to kubelet :10250 returned 502 Bad Gateway. LocalDNS exporter validation passed.
Likely cause/signature: shared-cluster-fleet-outage.
Confidence: high.
Strongest alternative: LocalDNS exporter failed-unit issue; less likely because exporter validation passed and final failure is kubelet proxy/network route related.
Recommended next action/owner: E2E/fleet infra owner; continue repair item https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_workitems/edit/38373323.
Wiki: shared-cluster-fleet-outagehttps://dev.azure.com/msazure/09706533-03bf-4b43-9a9b-b49c75429646/_wiki/wikis/ed4a85e9-1085-4151-a39b-2753523eba2b?pagePath=%2FAKS%2FSIGs%20and%20Teams%2FAKS%20Components%2FSIG%3A%20Node%20Lifecycle%2FAI%20Agent%20Knowledge%2FAgentBaker%20Gate%20PR%20Pipeline%20Flakiness

@aks-node-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

AgentBaker Linux gate detective

Run: https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_build/results?buildId=168868981
Failed job/stage/task: Run AgentBaker E2E / Test_Version_Consistency_GPU_Managed_Components
Summary: GPU managed component version consistency failed immediately after this PR's nvidia-dcgm update. HTTPSProxy and pod readiness signals appear secondary.
Likely cause/signature: gpu-managed-components-version-consistency-nvidia-dcgm.
Confidence: high.
Strongest alternative: infra/pod readiness flake; less likely because the first semantic failure is version consistency and aligns with the PR change.
Recommended next action/owner: GPU managed-components owner: align DCGM expected versions/metadata/test data.
Wiki: gpu-managed-components-version-consistency-nvidia-dcgmhttps://dev.azure.com/msazure/09706533-03bf-4b43-9a9b-b49c75429646/_wiki/wikis/ed4a85e9-1085-4151-a39b-2753523eba2b?pagePath=%2FAKS%2FSIGs%20and%20Teams%2FAKS%20Components%2FSIG%3A%20Node%20Lifecycle%2FAI%20Agent%20Knowledge%2FAgentBaker%20Gate%20PR%20Pipeline%20Flakiness

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from 650c82e to ca9b5cc Compare June 22, 2026 18:11
@aks-node-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@C:\Users\SYLVAI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\ab-gate-pr8659-169034678-comment.md

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 22, 2026 21:02
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/patch-nvidia-dcgm branch from ca9b5cc to cbbdcc7 Compare June 22, 2026 21:02

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@aks-node-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@C:\Users\SYLVAI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\ab-gate-pr8659-169061016-comment.md

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

components This pull request updates cached components on Linux or Windows VHDs renovate This pull request was created by renovate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants