-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Fix NoSQL object comparison being too strict #648
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is_user_operators_subset_of uses a has_keys flag to detect empty input. Add an early guard (if not user_operators: return False) to simplify the function and remove the auxiliary variable.
Show fix
Details
✨ AI Reasoning
The new function is_user_operators_subset_of checks whether the user_operators dict is non-empty and that each entry matches in filter_operators. Currently it iterates all items and uses a has_keys flag to detect emptiness, returning that at the end. An explicit early-return guard (if not user_operators: return False) would make the intent clearer and remove the auxiliary has_keys state, improving readability and maintainability.
Reply
@AikidoSec feedback: [FEEDBACK]to get better review comments in the future.Reply
@AikidoSec ignore: [REASON]to ignore this issue.More info