ProcessMaker-server for GLPI in docker container.

[Wolvverine]

It would be worth adding a dockerfile to create a dedicated server for GLPI in the docker, e.g. as a separate project associated with your version of the ProcessMaker server.

[Wolvverine]

With Travis test and upload to Docker Hub

[tomolimo]

Hello @Wolvverine
That's a good idea :)
Could you propose one?

Thank you,
Regards,
Tomolimo

[Wolvverine]

It seems to me that it would be best to use a ready-made solution, just use yours instead of the official version, and customize it.

https://github.com/processmaker-cloudops/docker

[tomolimo]

This version is not the latest, and of course, it's not the one that I've customized...

[Wolvverine]

Hello,

From what I can see, there are directories where write is required, and they contain data that should not disappear when the container is removed.

/ opt / processmaker-server / bootstrap / cache
/ opt / processmaker-server / workflow / engine / config /
/ opt / processmaker-server / workflow / engine / content / languages /
/ opt / processmaker-server / workflow / engine / plugins /
/ opt / processmaker-server / workflow / engine / xmlform /
/ opt / processmaker-server / workflow / engine / js / labels /
/ opt / processmaker-server / workflow / public_html / translations /
/opt/processmaker-server/workflow/public_html/index.html
/ opt / processmaker-server / shared /

Which of them can be cleanly re-uploaded, and which contain important data?

Shouldn't the data be separated from the code?

[Wolvverine]

A very initial version.

https://github.com/Wolvverine/docker-for-glpi-ProcessMaker

[Wolvverine]

Ready for use for tests, but you should remember about backup, because due to the lack of strict separation of configuration and data in the processmaker, configuration and data have not yet been separated into the volume.

[rivassh]

you can use https://github.com/rivassh/processmaker-several-version
I have 3.8 on my disk but 3.9 is dedicated on https://harbor.processmaker.io @Wolvverine

[tomolimo]

Hello @rivassh
To be tested of course :)
Thank you for your post.
Regards,
Tomolimo