-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
Tracking issue for the implementation of RFC 2011: Generic assert #96949
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
C-tracking-issueCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCF-generic_assert`#![feature(generic_assert)]``#![feature(generic_assert)]`T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
C-tracking-issueCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCF-generic_assert`#![feature(generic_assert)]``#![feature(generic_assert)]`T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Edit(fmease): The overarching tracking issue: #44838 (feature
generic_assert).Just a better-than-a-TODO internal issue to track the remaining things of #96496.
Capture(Postponed, see [RFC-2011] Expandmatches!arguments.matches!#110382)PartialEq.Capture block statementsPretty printing synchronization@rustbot claim