-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
LLVM coverage regression in nightly-2022-01-15 #93054
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
A-code-coverageArea: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage)Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage)C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.regression-untriagedUntriaged performance or correctness regression.Untriaged performance or correctness regression.requires-nightlyThis issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. When possible, use a F-* label instead.This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. When possible, use a F-* label instead.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-code-coverageArea: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage)Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage)C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.regression-untriagedUntriaged performance or correctness regression.Untriaged performance or correctness regression.requires-nightlyThis issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. When possible, use a F-* label instead.This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. When possible, use a F-* label instead.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Between nightly versions 2022-01-14 and 2022-01-15, grcov 0.8.2 lost track of 82% of the coverage of BonsaiDb when using the LLVM coverage option (
-Zinstrument-coverage).Other projects of mine continue to have code coverage correctly measured. I'm not where to start narrowing this down, as I'm not getting any errors or warnings printed.
Here are the steps to get good code coverage reports out of 2022-01-14:
If you look at the report in the coverage folder, the html report will show >80% coverage. Now, test with the next nightly:
If you look at the report again, the html report now shows < 1% coverage.
The quantity of profraw files are the same, and the sizes of the files are more or less equivalent. I'm not quite sure where to start narrowing this down since it's a unique issue to this project of mine -- but the only unique part I'm aware of is its size 😅.
For now I'll pin our CI to the last working nightly. Thank you in advance for any suggestions or help!