TextLLMRunner produces degenerate output for an LFM2.5 export that generates correctly when the same .pte is stepped token by token. Reproduces on macOS with the pip wheel and on Android through LlmModule, and does not depend on the export configuration.
Environment: executorch 1.4.0 (pip), torch 2.13.0, macOS arm64; also reproduced on a Pixel 8a with an AAR built from main.
What happens
Same .pte, same prompt, same machine, two ways of driving it:
token-by-token, explicit input_pos "Here are three colors:\n\n1. **Red**\n2. **Green**"
TextLLMRunner "s::::<|im_end|>"
Shorter prompts make the shape clearer — the runner repeats one token:
prompt "Hi" -> "HiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHi"
prompt "Name three colours." -> "<|im_end|><|im_end|>"
Repro
from executorch.extension.llm.custom_ops import custom_ops # noqa
from executorch.kernels import quantized # noqa
from executorch.extension.llm.runner import TextLLMRunner, GenerationConfig
r = TextLLMRunner("lfm2_5_350m_xnnpack_8da4w.pte", "tokenizer.json")
out = []
r.generate("Hi", GenerationConfig(max_new_tokens=16, echo=False), lambda t: out.append(t))
print("".join(out)) # HiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHi
The same file through a loop that steps one token at a time answers normally:
import torch
from executorch.extension.pybindings.portable_lib import _load_for_executorch
model = _load_for_executorch("lfm2_5_350m_xnnpack_8da4w.pte")
for i, tok in enumerate(prompt_tokens):
logits = model.forward((torch.tensor([[tok]]), torch.tensor([i])))[0]
# then greedy-decode from logits, advancing input_pos each step
The .pte is public: https://huggingface.co/mlboydaisuke/LFM2.5-350M-ExecuTorch — exported with
executorch.extension.llm.export.export_llm, qmode: 8da4w, embedding_quantize: "8,0",
XNNPACK.
What it is not
I re-exported the model to remove each candidate in turn and drove every build both ways:
| build |
forward input |
enable_dynamic_shape |
token-by-token |
TextLLMRunner |
shipped (use_sdpa_with_kv_cache: True) |
[1, 2047] |
True |
correct |
degenerate |
control (use_sdpa_with_kv_cache: False, enable_dynamic_shape: False) |
[1, 1] |
False |
correct |
degenerate |
So it is not the custom SDPA path, and not dynamic versus static shape — a static [1, 1] export,
which the runner should drive sequentially, fails the same way.
It is not the tokenizer either: the same tokenizer.json encodes the prompt to the expected ids
through a standalone HFTokenizer harness on the same machine, special tokens included, and the
.pte reports get_bos_id = 1, get_eos_ids = [7], matching the tokenizer.
And it is not the runner in general — Qwen3.5-0.8B exported the same way (8da4w,
embedding_quantize: "8,0", XNNPACK) generates correctly through TextLLMRunner on the same
build, so whatever this is interacts with something specific to LFM2.5.
A guess I could not confirm
LFM2.5 is a hybrid: short-convolution blocks interleaved with attention. Convolution blocks carry
state along the sequence, so anything that drives positions differently from a plain
one-token-at-a-time walk — a warmup pass, a re-prefill, a batched first step — would corrupt that
state while leaving a pure-attention model like Qwen unharmed. I could not confirm which of those
the runner does, so I am reporting the isolation rather than a diagnosis.
Happy to run further experiments against this model, or to test a patch.
This report was written with Claude.
cc @larryliu0820 @mergennachin @cccclai @helunwencser @jackzhxng @digantdesai
TextLLMRunnerproduces degenerate output for an LFM2.5 export that generates correctly when the same.pteis stepped token by token. Reproduces on macOS with the pip wheel and on Android throughLlmModule, and does not depend on the export configuration.Environment: executorch 1.4.0 (pip), torch 2.13.0, macOS arm64; also reproduced on a Pixel 8a with an AAR built from main.
What happens
Same
.pte, same prompt, same machine, two ways of driving it:Shorter prompts make the shape clearer — the runner repeats one token:
Repro
The same file through a loop that steps one token at a time answers normally:
The
.pteis public: https://huggingface.co/mlboydaisuke/LFM2.5-350M-ExecuTorch — exported withexecutorch.extension.llm.export.export_llm,qmode: 8da4w,embedding_quantize: "8,0",XNNPACK.
What it is not
I re-exported the model to remove each candidate in turn and drove every build both ways:
forwardinputenable_dynamic_shapeTextLLMRunneruse_sdpa_with_kv_cache: True)[1, 2047]use_sdpa_with_kv_cache: False,enable_dynamic_shape: False)[1, 1]So it is not the custom SDPA path, and not dynamic versus static shape — a static
[1, 1]export,which the runner should drive sequentially, fails the same way.
It is not the tokenizer either: the same
tokenizer.jsonencodes the prompt to the expected idsthrough a standalone
HFTokenizerharness on the same machine, special tokens included, and the.ptereportsget_bos_id = 1,get_eos_ids = [7], matching the tokenizer.And it is not the runner in general — Qwen3.5-0.8B exported the same way (
8da4w,embedding_quantize: "8,0", XNNPACK) generates correctly throughTextLLMRunneron the samebuild, so whatever this is interacts with something specific to LFM2.5.
A guess I could not confirm
LFM2.5 is a hybrid: short-convolution blocks interleaved with attention. Convolution blocks carry
state along the sequence, so anything that drives positions differently from a plain
one-token-at-a-time walk — a warmup pass, a re-prefill, a batched first step — would corrupt that
state while leaving a pure-attention model like Qwen unharmed. I could not confirm which of those
the runner does, so I am reporting the isolation rather than a diagnosis.
Happy to run further experiments against this model, or to test a patch.
This report was written with Claude.
cc @larryliu0820 @mergennachin @cccclai @helunwencser @jackzhxng @digantdesai