Skip to content

add TBS_LUCID_H7_V3 target#11635

Open
bkleiner wants to merge 1 commit into
iNavFlight:release/9.1from
tbs-fpv:add-lucid-h7-v3
Open

add TBS_LUCID_H7_V3 target#11635
bkleiner wants to merge 1 commit into
iNavFlight:release/9.1from
tbs-fpv:add-lucid-h7-v3

Conversation

@bkleiner

@bkleiner bkleiner commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This pull requests adds support for TBS_LUCID_H7_V3

  • Samples received
  • Flash firmware
  • Calibrate
  • Orientation matches
  • Gyro working
  • Accel working
  • Voltage correct
  • Current correct
  • Baro working
  • Mag I2C Bus
  • Additional I2C2 Buses (Airspeed/other accessories)
  • UART1
  • UART2
  • UART3
  • UART4
  • UART6
  • UART7
  • UART8
  • Analog Camera working
  • Video Out working
  • OSD working
  • LEDs working
  • Buzzer working
  • Motor outputs
  • DShot support on m1-4
  • Servo outputs
  • Blackbox
  • PINIO1
  • PINIO2
  • PINIO3

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Qodo reviews are paused for this user.

Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more →

On a Teams plan?
Reviews resume once this user has a paid seat and their Git account is linked in Qodo.
Link Git account →

Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center?
These require an Enterprise plan - Contact us
Contact us →

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Branch Targeting Suggestion

You've targeted the master branch with this PR. Please consider if a version branch might be more appropriate:

  • maintenance-9.x - If your change is backward-compatible and won't create compatibility issues between INAV firmware and Configurator 9.x versions. This will allow your PR to be included in the next 9.x release.

  • maintenance-10.x - If your change introduces compatibility requirements between firmware and configurator that would break 9.x compatibility. This is for PRs which will be included in INAV 10.x

If master is the correct target for this change, no action is needed.


This is an automated suggestion to help route contributions to the appropriate branch.

@bkleiner bkleiner mentioned this pull request Jun 9, 2026
30 tasks
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test firmware build ready — commit 0f6100b

Download firmware for PR #11635

239 targets built. Find your board's .hex file by name on that page (e.g. MATEKF405SE.hex). Files are individually downloadable — no GitHub login required.

Development build for testing only. Use Full Chip Erase when flashing.

@daijoubu

daijoubu commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Does this board support CANbus? If so, can you include the pin definitions for it?
// *************** CANBUS ****************************
#define USE_DRONECAN
#define CAN1_RX PD0
#define CAN1_TX PD1
#define CAN1_STANDBY PD3

If targeting maintenance-9.x or release-9.1 they can be commented out but I will have canbus support in v10.

@bkleiner

bkleiner commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Does this board support CANbus? If so, can you include the pin definitions for it?

i figured i would just do a MR for all of our flight controllers (most of them support CAN) to maintenance-10.x once we have these merged and rebased.

EDIT: ah i just saw you already got them in #11631, ok, sure lets add them then.

@daijoubu

daijoubu commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Either way works. I did a sweep of all boards that exist in AP and Inav and put in placeholders. Just looking for new boards to try and get the developer to put them in based on the schematics rather than me assuming AP has the correct hwdef.

@bkleiner

bkleiner commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Either way works. I did a sweep of all boards that exist in AP and Inav and put in placeholders. Just looking for new boards to try and get the developer to put them in based on the schematics rather than me assuming AP has the correct hwdef.

there any need for them to be commented out? i am happy to confirm all the pins right away.

@daijoubu

daijoubu commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No, I have not pushed any dronecan code to release/9.1 so it should not be an issue.

@bkleiner bkleiner changed the base branch from master to release/9.1 June 9, 2026 04:47
@bkleiner bkleiner added the New target This PR adds a new target label Jun 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

New target This PR adds a new target

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants