Parent: #2
Problem
TopicEye already has repository engineering guidance, but recent delivery history does not consistently demonstrate the virtual-intelligent-dev-team GitHub loop. Direct-to-main commits reduce reviewability, regression isolation and parallel-worker safety.
WorkOrder
Lead: Git Workflow Guardian / Conductor
Scope
- Define branch naming:
issue-<number>-<short-slug> (or equivalent documented convention).
- Require meaningful changes to have a GitHub Issue with context, scope, non-goals, acceptance criteria and verification plan.
- Require PRs to link the issue and include Worker evidence.
- Add/standardize PR template sections: WorkOrder, changes, tests, risks/rollback, verifier verdict, DeliveryCycleReport.
- Document independent verification policy: Verifier must not be the same implementation pass; remediation goes back to Worker and is re-verified.
- Require green required checks before merge where repository permissions/settings allow it.
- Document emergency/hotfix exception procedure and post-hoc audit requirement.
Acceptance criteria
Note
The connected GitHub App returned 403 when reading branch protection, so this issue does not assume the current protection state.
Parent: #2
Problem
TopicEye already has repository engineering guidance, but recent delivery history does not consistently demonstrate the
virtual-intelligent-dev-teamGitHub loop. Direct-to-main commits reduce reviewability, regression isolation and parallel-worker safety.WorkOrder
Lead: Git Workflow Guardian / Conductor
Scope
issue-<number>-<short-slug>(or equivalent documented convention).Acceptance criteria
Note
The connected GitHub App returned 403 when reading branch protection, so this issue does not assume the current protection state.