Can we add clang-format 22 to the list?

[Alexolut]

Is your idea related to an existing feature?

version

Describe the behavior you would like

Recently LLVM 22.1.0 has been released
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-22.1.0

Can we add that version into the list?

As far as I understand somewhere here

cpp-linter-action/.github/workflows/self-test.yml

Line 37 in b6edc06

clang-version: ['9', '10', '11', '12', '13', '14', '15', '16', '17', '18', '19', '20', '21']

Describe alternatives you have considered

No response

Additional context

No response

[2bndy5]

We haven't used it in any testing yet, which is what that line in the self-test workflow does. I'm most skeptic about support on Windows runners.

• On Linux (using Debian based Linux), v22 should already work since this action tries installing from the official LLVM PPA/install script. In fact, I've seen some users actually use nightly builds because of our reliance on the LLVM install script.
• On MacOS, v22 might fail if there is no homebrew formulae for v22 yet.
• On Windows, this action relies on the version available in the runner.

If the requested version is not found during any of the above cases, then this action tries to download a static binary from our clang-tools-static-binaries releases, which currently does not include v22 builds.