Generated code in latest version not compiling/missing OnPropertyChanged

[VMelnalksnis]

Description
After upgrading to 1.1.0, OnPropertyChanged either does not get called, or PropertyChanged.SourceGenerator.Internal.EventArgsCache.PropertyChanged_PropertyName gets passed instead of property name.

To Reproduce
This only generated OnPropertyChanging, but not OnPropertyChanged.

public sealed partial class TestModel
{
	[Notify]
	private decimal _total;
}

Version Info

• PropertyChanged.SourceGenerator version: 1.1.0
• Roslyn Version: Compiler version: '4.5.0-6.23127.3 (e2bc27d2)'. Language version: 11.0.

Additional Info
Upgrading to this version also caused various issues in Rider.
I had to clear caches/restart it multiple times to even reproduce the simple case.

[canton7]

Thanks! I've unlisted v1.1.0 until I get a chance to look into this

[LeviGNMBS]

Maybe related, is this a typo on line 69?

PropertyChanged.SourceGenerator/src/PropertyChanged.SourceGenerator/Generator.cs

Line 69 in 94690bb

interfaces.Add("global::System.CompoenntModel.INotifyPropertyChanging");

[chjrom]

When I cloned the repository (master branch) and manually packaged the project (dotnet pack) and used it in my project, everything works fine. There are no errors.

[canton7]

Maybe related, is this a typo on line 69?

PropertyChanged.SourceGenerator/src/PropertyChanged.SourceGenerator/Generator.cs

Line 69 in 94690bb

interfaces.Add("global::System.CompoenntModel.INotifyPropertyChanging");

Good spot, thanks. It shouldn't be possible to actually hit that code path: we only generate an INotifyPropertyChanging implementation if the user explicitly adds that interface to their type, and in that case we don't need to add the interface to our generated type.

[LeviGNMBS]

Good spot, thanks. It shouldn't be possible to actually hit that code path: we only generate an INotifyPropertyChanging implementation if the user explicitly adds that interface to their type, and in that case we don't need to add the interface to our generated type.

No problem but are you sure about that though? The example in the quick start doesn't add the interface. Isn't it supposed to be added by the source generator then?

[canton7]

Good spot, thanks. It shouldn't be possible to actually hit that code path: we only generate an INotifyPropertyChanging implementation if the user explicitly adds that interface to their type, and in that case we don't need to add the interface to our generated type.

No problem but are you sure about that though? The example in the quick start doesn't add the interface. Isn't it supposed to be added by the source generator then?

See here:

Working with INotifyPropertyChanging is similar, with the caveat that your class or one of its base classes must implement INotifyPropertyChanging (not everone wants to implement this interface, so it's opt-in)

[LeviGNMBS]

🤦 I misread changing for changed, typical MS to make such confusing names 😆