From bfbf2c552ebbce6611500070766feddb0fce8297 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tanishq Gandhi <56472134+tanishqgandhi1908@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 22:28:35 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] fix(frontend): render workflow covers on the hub landing page
(#8383)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
### What changes were proposed in this PR?
Workflow covers never rendered on the Hub landing page: every card under
**Top Loved Workflows** and **Top Cloned Workflows** showed the grey
placeholder, even for a workflow whose owner had set a cover, while the
same workflow showed it correctly in Your Work → Workflows.
Covers reach the frontend two different ways. A **workflow** cover is a
downscaled **data URL** that arrives inline on the list payload and
lands on `DashboardEntry.coverImageUrl`. A **dataset** or **model**
cover is a committed file, so what arrives is a *path* and the card has
to fetch a presigned URL from `/{id}/cover-url`.
`browse-section` only ever handled the second kind — it asks the
descriptor for a `coverUrl` and bails when there is none, which is
always the case for a workflow, since `WorkflowResourceDescriptor`
deliberately declares none. So nothing was ever cached for a workflow
and `getCoverImage` fell through to the default.
`getCoverImage` now reads a workflow's cover straight off the entry,
mirroring the branch `card-item.component.ts:197-202` already had.
Also included, since it is one line in the same area and needs no
separate issue: `frontend/proxy.config.json` declared `"/api/model/**"`
**twice** (both pointing at `:9092`, so the last silently won). The
duplicate is removed, leaving the entry beside `/api/dataset`, so the
file reads `dataset`, `model`, `access/dataset`, `access/model`.
**Before** — both workflows are public; the left one has a cover, the
right one does not:
**After** — the left card renders its cover, the right one still shows
the placeholder:
### Any related issues, documentation, discussions?
Closes #8382.
### How was this PR tested?
`browse-section.component.spec.ts`, 25 passed:
- `renders a workflow's cover from the entry, since no cover is ever
fetched for one` — a workflow
with a cover resolves to it, one without still gets the default.
- `keeps a file-backed kind on the placeholder rather than rendering its
stored cover path` — a
dataset whose presigned fetch answers with an empty URL stays on the
placeholder instead of
rendering `v1/images/preview.png`.
- `skips an entity whose descriptor resolves no cover, rather than
calling undefined` was already
there and asserted `getCoverImage(workflow) === defaultBackground` — it
pinned the bug, so it now
asserts the cover comes off the entry, with the unregistered-kind row
still falling back.
`landing-page.component.spec.ts` also run, 17 passed.
```
cd frontend
npx ng test --include src/app/hub/component/browse-section/browse-section.component.spec.ts
npx ng test --include src/app/hub/component/landing-page/landing-page.component.spec.ts
```
Checked by hand against a local stack: a public workflow with a cover
set from the dashboard now
shows it in both hub sections, and a public workflow without one is
unchanged.
### Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
(backported from commit 1facefb183c96e7b426ff6be35e5b6aaa7b33345)
Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 5)
---
frontend/proxy.config.json | 7 +-
.../browse-section.component.spec.ts | 88 +++++++++++++++++++
.../browse-section.component.ts | 11 +++
3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/frontend/proxy.config.json b/frontend/proxy.config.json
index 7801e0c256f..47988f6b46e 100755
--- a/frontend/proxy.config.json
+++ b/frontend/proxy.config.json
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
"secure": false,
"changeOrigin": true
},
-"/api/models": {
+ "/api/models": {
"target": "http://localhost:9096",
"secure": false,
"changeOrigin": true
@@ -45,11 +45,6 @@
"secure": false,
"changeOrigin": true
},
- "/api/model/**": {
- "target": "http://localhost:9092",
- "secure": false,
- "changeOrigin": true
- },
"/api/access/model/**": {
"target": "http://localhost:9092",
"secure": false,
diff --git a/frontend/src/app/hub/component/browse-section/browse-section.component.spec.ts b/frontend/src/app/hub/component/browse-section/browse-section.component.spec.ts
index a4b1ad301a4..490df8abf56 100644
--- a/frontend/src/app/hub/component/browse-section/browse-section.component.spec.ts
+++ b/frontend/src/app/hub/component/browse-section/browse-section.component.spec.ts
@@ -126,6 +126,94 @@ describe("BrowseSectionComponent", () => {
expect(component.getCoverImage(entity)).toBe(component.defaultBackground);
});
+<<<<<<< HEAD
+=======
+
+ // `this.resourceRegistry.find(entity.type)?.coverUrl` carries two guards, and a mixed section
+ // can trip either. A workflow's cover is a data URL carried on the entry itself, so
+ // WorkflowResourceDescriptor deliberately declares no `coverUrl`; and a kind the registry does
+ // not carry at all has no descriptor to ask, which is why this is `find`, not `get` — one such
+ // row must not take the whole section's covers down, exactly as `routeFor` five lines up
+ // already promises for links.
+ it("skips an entity whose descriptor resolves no cover, rather than calling undefined", () => {
+ const workflow = {
+ id: 10,
+ type: "workflow",
+ coverImageUrl: "carried-on-the-entry",
+ accessibleUserIds: [],
+ } as unknown as DashboardEntry;
+ const unregistered = {
+ id: 12,
+ type: "computing-unit",
+ coverImageUrl: "carried-on-the-entry",
+ accessibleUserIds: [],
+ } as unknown as DashboardEntry;
+ component.entities = [workflow, unregistered];
+
+ expect(() => component.ngOnInit()).not.toThrow();
+ expect(coverCache(component).has("workflow:10")).toBe(false);
+ expect(coverCache(component).has("computing-unit:12")).toBe(false);
+ // Nothing is cached for a workflow, but its cover is readable straight off the entry.
+ expect(component.getCoverImage(workflow)).toBe("carried-on-the-entry");
+ expect(component.getCoverImage(unregistered)).toBe(component.defaultBackground);
+ });
+
+ it("renders a workflow's cover from the entry, since no cover is ever fetched for one", () => {
+ const withCover = {
+ id: 20,
+ type: "workflow",
+ coverImageUrl: "",
+ accessibleUserIds: [],
+ } as unknown as DashboardEntry;
+ const withoutCover = { id: 21, type: "workflow", accessibleUserIds: [] } as unknown as DashboardEntry;
+ component.entities = [withCover, withoutCover];
+ component.ngOnInit();
+
+ expect(component.getCoverImage(withCover)).toBe("");
+ expect(component.getCoverImage(withoutCover)).toBe(component.defaultBackground);
+ });
+
+ it("keeps a file-backed kind on the placeholder rather than rendering its stored cover path", () => {
+ // A dataset's coverImageUrl is a path relative to the dataset root, not something an
+ // can load, so it must never stand in for the presigned URL the descriptor resolves.
+ vi.spyOn(TestBed.inject(DatasetService) as any, "getDatasetCoverUrl").mockReturnValue(of({ url: "" }));
+ const entity = {
+ id: 22,
+ type: "dataset",
+ coverImageUrl: "v1/images/preview.png",
+ accessibleUserIds: [],
+ } as unknown as DashboardEntry;
+ component.entities = [entity];
+ component.ngOnInit();
+
+ expect(component.getCoverImage(entity)).toBe(component.defaultBackground);
+ });
+
+ it("caches nothing when the descriptor resolves an empty cover url", () => {
+ // A presigned-URL endpoint with nothing to sign answers with an empty string; caching that
+ // would put an
on the card, which the browser resolves to the page itself.
+ vi.spyOn(TestBed.inject(DatasetService) as any, "getDatasetCoverUrl").mockReturnValue(of({ url: "" }));
+ const entity = {
+ id: 11,
+ type: "dataset",
+ coverImageUrl: "has-cover",
+ accessibleUserIds: [],
+ } as unknown as DashboardEntry;
+ component.entities = [entity];
+ component.ngOnInit();
+
+ // White-box on purpose: getCoverImage's `|| defaultBackground` makes "cached an empty string"
+ // and "cached nothing" indistinguishable through the public API, so only the map itself can
+ // say whether the guard ran.
+ expect(coverCache(component).has("dataset:11")).toBe(false);
+ expect(component.getCoverImage(entity)).toBe(component.defaultBackground);
+ });
+
+ /** The component's cover cache, which no public member exposes. */
+ function coverCache(c: BrowseSectionComponent): Map {
+ return (c as unknown as { coverImageUrls: Map }).coverImageUrls;
+ }
+>>>>>>> 1facefb18 (fix(frontend): render workflow covers on the hub landing page (#8383))
});
});
/**
diff --git a/frontend/src/app/hub/component/browse-section/browse-section.component.ts b/frontend/src/app/hub/component/browse-section/browse-section.component.ts
index 42274e82442..7a22cf31f8a 100644
--- a/frontend/src/app/hub/component/browse-section/browse-section.component.ts
+++ b/frontend/src/app/hub/component/browse-section/browse-section.component.ts
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
import { ChangeDetectorRef, Component, Input, OnChanges, OnInit, SimpleChanges } from "@angular/core";
import { DashboardEntry } from "../../../dashboard/type/dashboard-entry";
+import { EntityType } from "../../service/hub.service";
import { ResourceRegistryService } from "../../../dashboard/service/user/resource-registry/resource-registry.service";
import { UntilDestroy, untilDestroyed } from "@ngneat/until-destroy";
import {
@@ -144,6 +145,16 @@ export class BrowseSectionComponent implements OnInit, OnChanges {
}
getCoverImage(entity: DashboardEntry): string {
+<<<<<<< HEAD
return this.coverImageUrls.get(this.coverCacheKey(entity)) || this.defaultBackground;
+=======
+ // A workflow's cover is a downscaled data URL carried on the entry, so nothing is ever fetched
+ // for it. The file-backed kinds carry a stored path instead, which only the cache above can
+ // turn into something an
can load.
+ if (entity.type === EntityType.Workflow) {
+ return entity.coverImageUrl ?? this.defaultBackground;
+ }
+ return this.coverImageUrls.get(this.cacheKey(entity)) || this.defaultBackground;
+>>>>>>> 1facefb18 (fix(frontend): render workflow covers on the hub landing page (#8383))
}
}