You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
That still leaves one distinct gap: we do not currently have any external benchmark source for the CTC child composition that seems to be driving reform sensitivity.
Why this needs its own issue
I compared adjacent staged national ECPS artifacts after the recent CTC work and found that total ctc_qualifying_children moved only modestly, but the composition moved much more:
total ctc_qualifying_children: about -570k
tax units with 1 qualifying child: about -1.50M
tax units with 2 qualifying children: about -1.34M
tax units with 3+ qualifying children: about +1.06M
under-6 qualifying children: about -341k
age 6-17 qualifying children: about -229k
The biggest shifts were compositional inside low/mid AGI bands and filing-status cells, for example:
Head of household, $25k-$50k: about -3.21M weighted qualifying children
Head of household, $10k-$25k: about +3.12M
Joint / surviving spouse, $10k-$25k: about -2.31M
Joint / surviving spouse, $1-$10k: about +1.80M
That is exactly the kind of movement that can leave aggregate current-law totals looking acceptable while still moving ARPA-style or AFA-style reform effects materially.
Problem
The repo currently has the machinery to diagnose child composition, but not to target it against an external benchmark:
we can report ctc_qualifying_children
we can report 0 / 1 / 2 / 3+ qualifying-child buckets
we can report under-6 vs age-6-to-17 qualifying-child buckets
but we do not have source-backed target tables for those quantities
The current IRS/SOI ETL only gives us aggregate CTC amount/count targets and some AGI splits. It does not provide child-count or child-age composition targets for CTC qualifying children.
Proposal
Track a data-sourcing effort to identify the best available benchmark for at least some of these CTC-relevant child-composition quantities:
total ctc_qualifying_children
tax-unit distribution by 0 / 1 / 2 / 3+ CTC qualifying children
under-6 vs age-6-to-17 CTC qualifying children
ideally the same crossed with AGI band and/or filing status where possible
Potential source classes:
IRS tabulations not yet wired into the repo
CTC-focused Treasury / JCT / CRS tabulations
high-quality survey-admin linked external research if direct IRS publication tables do not exist
Success criteria
We identify whether a defensible external benchmark exists for any of the high-value child-composition buckets.
Recent CTC follow-up work now has:
ssn_card_typein ECPS #712That still leaves one distinct gap: we do not currently have any external benchmark source for the CTC child composition that seems to be driving reform sensitivity.
Why this needs its own issue
I compared adjacent staged national ECPS artifacts after the recent CTC work and found that total
ctc_qualifying_childrenmoved only modestly, but the composition moved much more:ctc_qualifying_children: about-570k-1.50M-1.34M+1.06M-341k-229kThe biggest shifts were compositional inside low/mid AGI bands and filing-status cells, for example:
Head of household,$25k-$50k: about-3.21Mweighted qualifying childrenHead of household,$10k-$25k: about+3.12MJoint / surviving spouse,$10k-$25k: about-2.31MJoint / surviving spouse,$1-$10k: about+1.80MThat is exactly the kind of movement that can leave aggregate current-law totals looking acceptable while still moving ARPA-style or AFA-style reform effects materially.
Problem
The repo currently has the machinery to diagnose child composition, but not to target it against an external benchmark:
ctc_qualifying_childrenThe current IRS/SOI ETL only gives us aggregate CTC amount/count targets and some AGI splits. It does not provide child-count or child-age composition targets for CTC qualifying children.
Proposal
Track a data-sourcing effort to identify the best available benchmark for at least some of these CTC-relevant child-composition quantities:
ctc_qualifying_childrenPotential source classes:
Success criteria