Replies: 2 comments
|
Interesting...... that would be nice indeed to add to the benchmark results and also to see where they are currently much stronger and sharpcoredb has some catching up to do . |
0 replies
|
Donewith some quirks but fully documented in the repo
2 ZVEC Needs AVX-512 to run my laptop is not AVX-512 capable ( I do have a XEON that is 512 capable in the basement so I have to set that up in the future ) , SharpCoreDB is multi AVX capable ( even non AVX ) thus also AVX-512 so I could only do a virtual compare against what I see on my hardware and what they claim |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Since the project is clearly positioning itself as a high‑performance embedded engine for .NET, I think it would be very interesting to also compare against two newer “neighbors” in the same space:
Why these two?
BLite is probably the closest thing to “LiteDB 2.0” in terms of ambition: embedded, .NET, but with a strong focus on performance and document‑style workloads. It would be great to see:
Zvec is being pitched as the “SQLite of vector databases”, and SharpCoreDB now has serious HNSW + SIMD vector capabilities too. A comparison would be very valuable for people building RAG / local‑AI apps:
Thanks again for the amazing work on this project – it’s quickly becoming a very strong candidate for local AI + data‑heavy .NET apps.
All reactions