diff --git a/config/examples/loopover.full.yml b/config/examples/loopover.full.yml
index 13096355f..24056fc0c 100644
--- a/config/examples/loopover.full.yml
+++ b/config/examples/loopover.full.yml
@@ -290,6 +290,25 @@ gate:
     - name: Contributor trust
       appSlug: example-security-app
 
+  # Check-runs to IGNORE ENTIRELY (#9810) — the stronger sibling of advisoryCheckRuns above. Same
+  # spoof-resistant { name, appSlug } matching, but a matched run is treated as if it did not exist: it never
+  # gates CI, never counts as "still running", and — unlike advisory — never routes the PR to a manual-review
+  # hold either. Its conclusion is surfaced informationally only.
+  #
+  # Use this when a check's verdict carries no signal for YOUR repo while OTHER checks from the same app stay
+  # meaningful. The motivating case: a vendor app publishes both a real security scan AND a heuristic
+  # contributor-trust score. The scan is worth gating on; the trust score fails for perfectly good
+  # contributors, and listing it under advisoryCheckRuns still converts every one of their otherwise-clean PRs
+  # into a manual review — automation replaced by a queue of human decisions, and contributors left wondering
+  # whether they are being judged fairly. Ignoring the trust check keeps the scan's protection and drops the
+  # noise. If BOTH lists name the same check, ignore wins (it is the stronger, more explicit intent).
+  #
+  # List of { name, appSlug }, or omit. Default: not configured (byte-identical behavior for every repo that
+  # doesn't opt in). Config-as-code only — no DB column or dashboard toggle.
+  ignoredCheckRuns:
+    - name: Contributor trust
+      appSlug: example-security-app
+
   # Promote a confident AI-judgment-only finding (one the reviewer itself placed under "Blockers", never
   # a "Nit") into a real, deterministic gate blocker instead of leaving it advisory (#3907). Only matters
   # for repos already running the registry content lane (see contentLane below) — content/registry repos
diff --git a/test/unit/agent-approval-queue.test.ts b/test/unit/agent-approval-queue.test.ts
index f38c30cf2..82be71643 100644
--- a/test/unit/agent-approval-queue.test.ts
+++ b/test/unit/agent-approval-queue.test.ts
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ describe("agent approval queue (#779)", () => {
 
     expect(result.status).toBe("accepted");
     expect(fetchRequiredStatusContexts).toHaveBeenCalledWith(env, "owner/repo", null, expect.any(String), expect.any(String));
-    expect(fetchLiveCiAggregate).toHaveBeenCalledWith(env, "owner/repo", "h7", expect.any(String), new Set(["build", "test"]), expect.any(String), undefined);
+    expect(fetchLiveCiAggregate).toHaveBeenCalledWith(env, "owner/repo", "h7", expect.any(String), new Set(["build", "test"]), expect.any(String), undefined, undefined);
   });
 
   it("unions branch-protection contexts into the accept-time live CI re-check", async () => {
@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ describe("agent approval queue (#779)", () => {
 
     expect(result.status).toBe("accepted");
     expect(fetchRequiredStatusContexts).toHaveBeenCalledWith(env, "owner/repo", "main", expect.any(String), expect.any(String));
-    expect(fetchLiveCiAggregate).toHaveBeenCalledWith(env, "owner/repo", "h7", expect.any(String), new Set(["branch-required", "build"]), expect.any(String), undefined);
+    expect(fetchLiveCiAggregate).toHaveBeenCalledWith(env, "owner/repo", "h7", expect.any(String), new Set(["branch-required", "build"]), expect.any(String), undefined, undefined);
   });
 
   it("falls back to expectedCiContexts when the accept-time branch-protection read fails", async () => {
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ describe("agent approval queue (#779)", () => {
     const result = await decidePendingAgentAction(env, { id: action.id, decision: "accept", decidedBy: "owner" });
 
     expect(result.status).toBe("accepted");
-    expect(fetchLiveCiAggregate).toHaveBeenCalledWith(env, "owner/repo", "h7", expect.any(String), new Set(["build"]), expect.any(String), null);
+    expect(fetchLiveCiAggregate).toHaveBeenCalledWith(env, "owner/repo", "h7", expect.any(String), new Set(["build"]), expect.any(String), null, null);
   });
 
   it("accept supersedes a staged merge when live CI has since turned pending, not just failed (#2126)", async () => {
diff --git a/test/unit/queue.test.ts b/test/unit/queue.test.ts
index 54be4cf85..c82c44b2e 100644
--- a/test/unit/queue.test.ts
+++ b/test/unit/queue.test.ts
@@ -1877,6 +1877,7 @@ describe("queue processors", () => {
         new Set(["trusted-required-ci"]),
         "installation:9001",
         undefined, // #4372: advisoryCheckRuns (unconfigured here)
+        undefined, // #9813: ignoredCheckRuns (unconfigured here)
       );
       expect(gateChecks).toBeGreaterThan(0);
       const finalized = await env.DB.prepare("select count(*) as n from audit_events where event_type = ?")
@@ -3168,8 +3169,9 @@ describe("queue processors", () => {
         await processJob(env, { type: "agent-regate-pr", deliveryId: "required-contexts-lookup-recovers", repoFullName: "owner/agent-repo", prNumber: 7, installationId: 9001 });
         expect(liveCiSpy.mock.calls.length).toBeGreaterThan(liveReadsAfterFailedLookup);
         expect(await renderMetrics()).toContain('loopover_ci_state_cache_total{field="aggregate",result="miss"} 1');
-        // #4372: the durable cache key now folds in the advisory-check-runs fingerprint (empty "|adv:" when unconfigured).
-        expect(await getPullRequestDetailSyncState(env, "owner/agent-repo", 7)).toMatchObject({ ciState: "passed", ciRequiredContextsKey: `${JSON.stringify(["trusted-required-ci"])}|adv:` });
+        // #4372 + #9813: the durable cache key folds in the advisory-check-runs AND ignored-check-runs
+        // fingerprints (both empty here -- "|adv:|ign:" -- because neither is configured on this repo).
+        expect(await getPullRequestDetailSyncState(env, "owner/agent-repo", 7)).toMatchObject({ ciState: "passed", ciRequiredContextsKey: `${JSON.stringify(["trusted-required-ci"])}|adv:|ign:` });
       } finally {
         liveCiSpy.mockRestore();
       }