test(admin): registry-drift guard for adminAllowedTiers vs plans.yaml (rule 18)

internal/handlers/admin_allowed_tiers_registry_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+package handlers
+
+// admin_allowed_tiers_registry_test.go — rule-18 drift guard.
+//
+// adminAllowedTiers (admin_customers.go) is a hand-maintained closed set of
+// the tiers an admin may set on a team. The capabilities-contract regression
+// (a hardcoded slice that silently dropped hobby_plus for 3h) is the bug class
+// this guards: a NEW tier added to plans.yaml must be consciously filed as
+// either admin-settable OR explicitly excluded — never silently forgotten.
+//
+// Per rule 18 the test iterates the LIVE plans registry rather than a
+// hand-typed tier list, so adding a tier to plans.yaml reds CI until someone
+// makes the decision.
+
+import (
+	"testing"
+
+	"instant.dev/internal/plans"
+)
+
+func TestAdminAllowedTiers_StaysInSyncWithPlanRegistry(t *testing.T) {
+	// Tiers that are deliberately NOT admin-settable, each with the reason.
+	// Adding a tier here is the conscious "this is not an admin headline tier"
+	// decision the guard forces.
+	adminExcluded := map[string]string{
+		"anonymous":         "unclaimed default; not a settable account tier",
+		"growth":            "upsell-only API tier; admin UI exposes headline tiers only",
+		"hobby_plus":        "upsell-only API tier; admin UI exposes headline tiers only",
+		"hobby_plus_yearly": "yearly variant of an upsell-only tier",
+		"hobby_yearly":      "yearly billing variant; admin sets the monthly headline tier",
+		"pro_yearly":        "yearly billing variant; admin sets the monthly headline tier",
+		"team_yearly":       "yearly billing variant; admin sets the monthly headline tier",
+	}
+
+	all := plans.Default().All()
+	if len(all) == 0 {
+		t.Fatal("plans registry is empty — cannot validate adminAllowedTiers drift")
+	}
+
+	for tier := range all {
+		settable := adminAllowedTiers[tier]
+		_, excluded := adminExcluded[tier]
+		switch {
+		case settable && excluded:
+			t.Errorf("tier %q is BOTH admin-settable and in the exclude set — contradiction; "+
+				"remove it from one (admin_customers.go / this test)", tier)
+		case !settable && !excluded:
+			t.Errorf("tier %q exists in plans.yaml but is neither in adminAllowedTiers nor the "+
+				"documented exclude set — file it on one side (rule 18)", tier)
+		}
+	}
+
+	// Belt: no stale entry in adminAllowedTiers that no longer exists in the
+	// registry (a removed/renamed tier left behind).
+	for tier := range adminAllowedTiers {
+		if _, ok := all[tier]; !ok {
+			t.Errorf("adminAllowedTiers contains %q which is not present in plans.yaml", tier)
+		}
+	}
+	// Belt: no stale exclude entry either.
+	for tier := range adminExcluded {
+		if _, ok := all[tier]; !ok {
+			t.Errorf("adminExcluded test set contains %q which is not present in plans.yaml — "+
+				"drop the stale entry", tier)
+		}
+	}
+}