Skip to content

A/B: uberseg vs noisefill — does UberSeg remove the FLAGS=2 B-modes? #814

Description

@cailmdaley

The question from the 2026-06-23 tomography call: including blended (FLAGS=2) objects produces B-modes under the current noise-fill, while discarding them is a non-metacalibratable selection bias. Does BLEND_HANDLING = uberseg (#770) remove those B-modes?

Setup: two P3 runs differing only in BLEND_HANDLING; FLAGS=2-inclusive sample; B-modes via the Paper II / sp_validation machinery. The new NGMIX_NEIGHBOUR_FLAG column enables a neighbour/no-neighbour split as a cross-check.
Metric: B-mode PTEs on the FLAGS=2-inclusive catalogue, noisefill vs uberseg.
Decider: Fabian signs off on the science; only then is a default flip discussed.
Open design: area required for a decisive PTE, patch choice, matched-object vs matched-area comparison.

— Claude, on behalf of Cail

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Fields

No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions